A framework for computing angle of progression from transperineal ultrasound images for evaluating fetal head descent using a novel double branch network
Open accessAbstract
Background: Accurate assessment of fetal descent by monitoring the fetal head (FH) station remains a clinical challenge in guiding obstetric management. Angle of progression (AoP) has been suggested to be a reliable and reproducible parameter for the assessment of FH descent. Methods: A novel framework, including image segmentation, target fitting and AoP calculation, is proposed for evaluating fetal descent. For image segmentation, this study presents a novel double branch segmentation network (DBSN), which consists of two parts: an encoding part receives image input, and a decoding part composed of deformable convolutional blocks and ordinary convolutional blocks. The decoding part includes the lower and upper branches, and the feature map of the lower branch is used as the input of the upper branch to assist the upper branch in decoding after being constrained by the attention gate (AG). Given an original transperineal ultrasound (TPU) image, areas of the pubic symphysis (PS) and FH are firstly segmented using the proposed DBSN, the ellipse contours of segmented regions are secondly fitted with the least square method, and three endpoints are finally determined for calculating AoP. Results: Our private dataset with 313 transperineal ultrasound (TPU) images was used for model evaluation with 5-fold cross-validation. The proposed method achieves the highest Dice coefficient (93.4%), the smallest Average Surface Distance (6.268 pixels) and the lowest AoP difference (5.993°) by comparing four state-of-the-art methods. Similar results (Dice coefficient: 91.7%, Average Surface Distance: 7.729 pixels: AoP difference: 5.110°) were obtained on a public dataset with >3,700 TPU images for evaluating its generalization performance. Conclusion: The proposed framework may be used for the automatic measurement of AoP with high accuracy and generalization performance. However, its clinical availability needs to be further evaluated.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lu et al. and Bai et al. proposed a method for the automated measurement of the angle of progression, which allowed for the estimation of fetal head descent by identifying the symphysis and fetal head contour.
“In addition to this, Lu et al. and Bai et al. proposed a method for the automated measurement of the angle of progression, which allowed for the estimation of fetal head descent by identifying the symphysis and fetal head contour [173,174].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 36
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Jaderberg M. Simonyan K. Zisserman A. (2015). Spatial transformer networks. Adv. neural Inf. Process. Syst. 28, 2017– 2025.
- Zhou M. Yuan C. Chen Z. Wang C. Lu Y. (2020). “ Automatic angle of progress measurement of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound image with deep learning,” in International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (Berlin, Germany: Springer), 406– 414.
- Authors
- Bai, J., Sun, Z., Yu, S., Lu, Y., Long, S., Wang, H., Qiu, R., Ou, Z., Zhou, M., Zhi, D., Zhou, M., Jiang, X., & Chen, G.
- Affiliations
- Jinan University (CN)
- Zhujiang Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Bai, Jieyun
- Chen, Gaowen
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Physiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2022-12-02
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 940150-940150
- ISSN
- 1664-042X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9755498
- OpenAlex
- W4311194876
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- angle of progression, fetal head descent, transperineal ultrasound, deformable convolution, attention gate, fetal head segmentation, ellipse fitting, obstetric management, deep learning image segmentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review