The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Practice Bulletin No. 130: Prediction and Prevention of Preterm Birth
Abstract
This document has been withdrawn or is no longer available Please contact the Resource Center at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ([email protected]; 202-863-2518) for further information Current clinical guidance from ACOG is available online at https://www.acog.org/clinical
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several medical societies recommend serial transvaginal sonographic CL measurement at 16-23 weeks in this population 104,105,108,109 .”
From ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan (2022) · cites this paper as [105]
In the citing paper
“For these reasons, transvaginal ultrasound CL measurement is commonly recommended in the general population 104-106 .”
From ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan (2022) · cites this paper as [105]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The global epidemiology of preterm birth
Vogel, J. P., Chawanpaiboon, S., Moller, A.-B., Watananirun, K., Bonet, M., & Lumbiganon, P. (2018) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.04.003 · Cited by 1,005
Romero, R., Conde-Agudelo, A., Da Fonseca, E., O’Brien, J. M., Cetingoz, E., Creasy, G. W., Hassan, S. S., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.576 · Cited by 522
ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan
Salomon, L. J., Alfirevic, Z., Berghella, V., Bilardo, C. M., Chalouhi, G. E., Da Silva Costa, F., Hernandez‐Andrade, E., Malinger, G., Munoz, H., Paladini, D., et al. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.24888 · Cited by 436
Racial and ethnic differences in preterm birth: a complex, multifactorial problem
Manuck, T. A. (2017) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2017.08.010 · Cited by 334
Haas, D. M., Parker, C. B., Wing, D. A., Parry, S. I., Grobman, W. A., Mercer, B. M., Simhan, H. N., Hoffman, M., Silver, R. M., Wadhwa, P. D., et al. (2015) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.019 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 964-973
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110330014
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Progestins, Progesterone, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Cerclage, Cervical, Premature Birth, Cervical Length Measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
