Cited by 25Burn Injury Management and OutcomesDermatologic Treatments and ResearchCancer survivorship and care

The burn survivor perspective

Acton, Amy R., Mounsey, Erin, Gilyard, Chris·2007·Journal of Burn Care & Research

Abstract

The burn survivor's perspective is critical in helping focus the priorities for burn research during the next 10 years. The goal of medical science is to improve outcomes and the lives of those we serve. As individuals who have experienced a burn injury, burn survivors can provide an important and unique perspective. There have been numerous advances in burn care and, as was discussed in the first 2 days of this State of the Science conference, there is a lot of work yet to be done. Each of us has tremendous respect and gratitude toward the burn team, and the following comments are made with the goal of improving care for current and future burn survivors. Real progress can happen if we work together to develop the goals, knowledge base, and then ultimately implement the available and proven interventions as a standard of care. The purpose of the burn survivor panel discussion was to provide a personal perspective of the priorities in burn care research. The collective burn survivor community is a wealth of information—if we listen. Both Erin Mounsey and Chris Gilyard are burn survivors with a point of view that will help demonstrate some common themes we hear across the country at the Phoenix Society for Burn Survivors. They are two individuals burned some 20 plus years apart and both believe that psychosocial rehabilitation of patients should be the priority in patient care and thus the priority for research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/bcr.0b013e318093e4db

Cites

0 references resolved

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People who survive burn injuries are known to experience appearance anxiety due to the unexpected and sudden change in appearance due to scarring, as well as other psychological difficulties.

    “People who survive burn injuries are known to experience appearance anxiety. This is due to the unexpected and sudden change in appearance due to scarring from such injuries, as well as other psychological difficulties such as those aforementioned [23,37-38].”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Acton, A. R., Mounsey, E., & Gilyard, C.
Affiliations
  • Phoenix Society for Burn Survivors (US)
  • Regions Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Acton, Amy R.
Venue
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Published
2007-07
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
615-620
ISSN
1559-047X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077615334
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Burn Care & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
burn survivors, psychosocial rehabilitation, patient experience, standard of care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anecdotes as Topic, Attitude to Health, Burns, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Survivors, Evidence-Based Medicine, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review