Development and use of biochemical markers in osteoarthritis: current update
Abstract
Purpose of review There is an increasing demand for noninvasive and descriptive biochemical markers (biomarkers) in osteoarthritis; for enabling early drug development (including translational research), evaluating clinical trial at an early stage and for subtyping. Purpose of the review is to review and comment on current availability of such biomarkers. Recent findings Many different biomarkers have been tested in the last 18 months. The main focus has been on testing whether the biomarkers, whether is reflect joint tissue turnover or inflammatory status, can differentiate osteoarthritis patients from healthy controls or whether the biomarkers are associated with progression. Less than a handful of studies, investigate the role of the biomarkers as response markers. Thus, there is still a great need for developing biomarkers that reflect disease activity and thereby can be used for treatment response or patient phenotyping. Summary Osteoarthritis is the most common form of joint disease. This presents the osteoarthritis research community and pharmaceutical companies developing disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs) with great opportunities. There are different osteoarthritis subtypes, which complicates the traditional approaches for developing new treatments. If we can identify new markers that can distinguish different subtypes, this can greatly facilitate drug development from early discovery to late clinical development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biomarker rate of change often predicts outcomes better than static measurements.
“with findings indicating that biomarker rate of change often predicts outcomes better than static measurements [161].”
From Biomarker-Guided Imaging and AI-Augmented Diagnosis of Degenerative Joint Disease (2025) · cites this paper as [161]
Longitudinal biomarker studies track molecular changes over time through repeated sampling, using advanced statistical models like mixed-effects modeling and trajectory analysis to capture dynamic patterns related to disease progression and treatment response.
“Longitudinal biomarker studies track molecular changes over time through repeated sampling, using advanced statistical models like mixed-effects modeling and trajectory analysis to capture dynamic patterns related to disease progression and treatment response”
From Biomarker-Guided Imaging and AI-Augmented Diagnosis of Degenerative Joint Disease (2025) · cites this paper as [161]
Cites
Goldring, S. R., & Goldring, M. B. (2016) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2016.148 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
Application of biomarkers in the development of drugs intended for the treatment of osteoarthritis
Kraus, V. B., Burnett, B., Coindreau, J., Cottrell, S., Eyre, D., Gendreau, M., Gardiner, J., Garnero, P., Hardin, J., Henrotin, Y., et al. (2011) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2010.08.019 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Lorenzo, P., Aspberg, A., Saxne, T., & Önnerfjord, P. (2017) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2017.04.004 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Styrkarsdottir, U., Lund, S. H., Thorleifsson, G., Saevarsdottir, S., Gudbjartsson, D. F., Thorsteinsdottir, U., & Stefansson, K. (2023) · Arthritis & Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/art.42376 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Biomarker-Guided Imaging and AI-Augmented Diagnosis of Degenerative Joint Disease
Kumar, R., Sporn, K., Borole, A., Khanna, A., Gowda, C., Paladugu, P., Ngo, A., Jagadeesan, R., Zaman, N., & Tavakkoli, A. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15111418 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bay-Jensen, A. C., Thudium, C. S., & Mobasheri, A.
- Affiliations
- Rheumatology, Biomarkers and Research, Nordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev, Denmark
- Nordic Bioscience (Denmark) (DK)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Rheumatology
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 121-128
- ISSN
- 1040-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-6963
- OpenAlex
- W2765753931
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
- Keywords
- osteoarthritis, biochemical markers, disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs, disease activity, treatment response biomarkers, inflammation, disease progression, patient phenotyping
- MeSH terms
- Bone Resorption, Cartilage, Articular, Fibrosis, Humans, Inflammation, Osteoarthritis, Synovial Membrane, Synovitis, Biomarkers, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review