Cited by 108Osteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans researchConnective tissue disorders research

Type II collagen markers in osteoarthritis: what do they indicate?

Henrotin, Yves, Addison, Shelby, Kraus, Virginia, Deberg, Michelle·2007·Current Opinion in Rheumatology

Abstract

Purpose of review We provide a critical review of recent in-vitro, animal and human clinical studies on type II collagen biomarkers. In describing the human studies, we have applied the BIPED (burden of disease, investigative, prognostic, efficacy of intervention, and diagnostic) classification scheme recently proposed by the Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Network (a consortium of five US National Institutes of Health designated sites). Based on this analysis, we propose an update to the classification of the type II collagen biomarkers. Recent findings Various type II collagen epitopes have been described as potential biomarkers for osteoarthritis. Some have demonstrated ability in the following areas: classification of individuals as either diseased or nondiseased; assessment of severity or extent of osteoarthritis; prediction of future onset of osteoarthritis among those without osteoarthritis at baseline or the progression of osteoarthritis among those with existing disease; and monitoring treatment efficacy. Summary Type II collagen biomarkers provide useful information for clinical and research applications. Furthermore, they are promising tools for the monitoring the influence of drug treatment on cartilage metabolism in joint diseases such as osteoarthritis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/bor.0b013e32829fb3b5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inter-laboratory standardization and age/sex/ethnicity-stratified reference ranges remain challenges for broad adoption of CTX-II and COMP.

    “Though inter-laboratory standardization and age/sex/ethnicity-stratified reference ranges remain challenges for broad adoption”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henrotin, Y., Addison, S., Kraus, V., & Deberg, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Henrotin, Yves
Venue
Current Opinion in Rheumatology
Published
2007-09
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
444-450
ISSN
1040-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081398021
Cited by
108
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
Keywords
type II collagen, osteoarthritis, biomarkers, cartilage metabolism, disease severity, prognosis, treatment monitoring, cartilage degeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Cartilage, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Osteoarthritis, Biomarkers, Collagen Type II

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review