Cited by 86Sarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

Outcome of Expandable Prostheses in Children

Ruggieri, Pietro, Mavrogenis, Andreas F., Pala, Elisa, Romantini, Matteo, Manfrini, Marco, Mercuri, Mario·2013·Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Expandable prostheses offer the advantages of limb-salvage and limb-length equality at skeletal maturity. However, what is the cost for achieving that goal, and in how many children this is achieved? MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present 32 children (16 boys and 16 girls; mean age, 9 y) with bone sarcomas of the femur treated with limb salvage using expandable prostheses. The Kotz Growing prosthesis and the noninvasive Repiphysis and Stanmore expandable prostheses were used. The mean follow-up was 49 months. Survival analysis of the children and primary implants and functional evaluation were performed. RESULTS: Survival of the children was 94% and 84% at 48 and 72 months. Survival of the primary prostheses was 78% and 66% at 48 and 72 months; survival was significantly higher only for the Kotz when compared with the Repiphysis prostheses (P=0.026). The rate of implant-related complications was 51.3%; 9 prostheses (23%) were revised because of aseptic loosening, infection, and breakage. A mean total lengthening of 28 mm (4 to 165 mm) was achieved by 84 procedures (2.6 procedures/patient). Three of the 9 children who reached skeletal maturity had limb-length equality and 6 discrepancy of 15 to 30 mm. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was excellent (79%) without a significant difference between the type of prostheses (P=0.934). CONCLUSIONS: The Kotz Growing prosthesis, although it requires an open lengthening procedure, has shown higher survival when compared with the noninvasive Repiphysis prosthesis. However, the total lengthening remains small, and the complications rates are high even with the noninvasive prostheses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/bpo.0b013e318286c178

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Minimally invasive and non-invasive growing implants enable limb-salvage reconstruction and future limb-length equality for patients with skeletal immaturity.

    “Minimally invasive and non-invasive growing implants enable limb-salvage reconstruction as well as future limb-length equality for patients with skeletal immaturity 135 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [135]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruggieri, P., Mavrogenis, A. F., Pala, E., Romantini, M., Manfrini, M., & Mercuri, M.
Affiliations
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT)
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Published
2013-04
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
244-253
ISSN
0271-6798 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024296333
Cited by
86
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Keywords
limb salvage, bone sarcoma, children, limb length discrepancy, skeletal maturity, implant survival, aseptic loosening, implant-associated infection, functional outcome
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Bone Lengthening, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Femoral Neoplasms, Humans, Leg Length Inequality, Male, Prosthesis Design, Retrospective Studies, Osteosarcoma, Treatment Outcome, Prostheses and Implants, Limb Salvage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review