Cited by 71Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and RehabilitationWorkplace Health and Well-being

One-Year Follow-Up in Employees Sick-Listed Because of Low Back Pain: Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Multidisciplinary and Brief Intervention

Jensen, Chris, Jensen, Ole Kudsk, Christiansen, David Høyrup, Nielsen, Claus Vinther·2011·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial comparing two interventions in employees sick-listed 3 to 16 weeks because of low back pain (LBP). OBJECTIVE: To compare 1-year return to work (RTW), pain, disability and physical and mental health dimensions in subjects offered a hospital-based multidisciplinary intervention or a brief intervention. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies in sick-listed employees with LBP have indicated efficacy of both brief and more comprehensive multidisciplinary interventions. However, it remains unknown, which is the more effective, and which elements are instrumental in furthering RTW, and improving health. METHODS: The brief intervention comprised clinical examination and advice offered by a rehabilitation physician and a physiotherapist. In the multidisciplinary intervention, this intervention was supplemented with the expertise of a team and the assignment of a case manager who drew up a rehabilitation plan in collaboration with the patient and the multidisciplinary team. One-year RTW was estimated by data from a comprehensive national database of social transfer payments. Questionnaires were used to obtain baseline and 1-year data on Roland Morris disability score, LBP Rating Scale, SF36, and fear-avoidance. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were included and randomized and 344 (98%) patients participated in all the consultations according to the study protocol. RTW was achieved by 125 (71.0%) participants in the multidisciplinary and 133 (76.0%) participants in the brief intervention group. The hazard ratio was 0.84 after adjustment for sex, age, smoking, compensation claims, disability score, and diagnosis (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.08,P = 0.18). Multiple linear regression analysis displayed no differences in secondary outcomes, except for the mental health score (SF36), which was a little higher in the multidisciplinary intervention group than in the brief intervention group. CONCLUSION: Hospital-based multidisciplinary intervention may be no better than brief intervention to increase RTW and improve health in sick-listed employees with low back pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181eba711

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen, C., Jensen, O. K., Christiansen, D. H., & Nielsen, C. V.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Regionshospitalet Silkeborg (DK)
Corresponding author
  • Jensen, Chris
  • Christiansen, David Høyrup
  • Nielsen, Claus Vinther
Venue
Spine
Published
2011-07
Volume
36
Issue
15
Pages
1180-1189
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2181316415
Cited by
71
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Spine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
low back pain, sick leave, return to work, multidisciplinary intervention, brief intervention, case management, rehabilitation, disability, pain, mental health, occupational health
MeSH terms
Adult, Disability Evaluation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Sick Leave, Pain Clinics, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review