The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Costs Associated With Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: An Analysis of the UK General Practice Research Database
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of health care costs associated with the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP) in the United Kingdom. OBJECTIVE: To assess 12-month health care costs associated with the treatment of CLBP, using the UK General Practice Research Database. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CLBP is a common health problem. METHODS: Data were obtained from the General Practice Research Database, a computerized database of UK primary care patient data. Patients with CLBP were identified for the study period (January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2009) using diagnostic records and pain relief prescriptions (n = 64,167), and 1:1 matched to patients without CLBP (n = 52,986) on the basis of age, sex, and general practitioner's practice. Index date was defined as the first date of CLBP record; the same index date was assigned to matched controls. Multivariate analyses were performed to compare resource use costs (2009 values) in the 12 months after the index date between patients with and without CLBP. A sensitivity analysis was carried out with a more stringent definition for the control group by excluding a broad range of pain conditions. RESULTS: Total health care costs for patients with CLBP were double those of the matched controls (£1074 vs. £516; P < 0.05). Of the cost difference, 58.8% was accounted for by general practitioner's consultations, 22.3% by referrals to secondary care, and the rest by pain relief medications. The sensitivity analysis revealed an even greater cost difference between the 2 groups (£1052 vs. £304; P < 0.05). Because of the use of a retrospective administrative claims database, this study is subject to selection bias between study cohorts, misidentification of comorbidities, and an inability to confirm adherence to therapy or assess indirect costs and costs of over-the-counter medications. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm the substantial economic burden of CLBP, even with direct costs only.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For patients with chronic pain, an added problem is that patients combine appointments with their general practitioner, emergency services and specialized pain clinics for the treatment of their pain and related symptoms [33].”
Citations
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742
Chapter 4 European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain
Airaksinen, O., Brox, J. I., Cedraschi, C., Hildebrandt, J., Klaber-Moffett, J., Kovacs, F., Mannion, A. F., Reis, S., Staal, J. B., Ursin, H., et al. (2006) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1 · Cited by 2,594
Dagenais, S., Caro, J., & Haldeman, S. (2008) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005 · Cited by 2,046
The economic burden of back pain in the UK
Maniadakis, N., & Gray, A. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00187-6 · Cited by 1,510
The Rising Prevalence of Chronic Low Back Pain
Freburger, J. K., Holmes, G. M., Agans, R. P., Jackman, A. M., Darter, J. D., Wallace, A. S., Castel, L. D., Kalsbeek, W. D., & Carey, T. S. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2008.543 · Cited by 1,507
The Prevalence of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1966 to 1998
Walker, B. F. (2000) · Journal of Spinal Disorders · doi:10.1097/00002517-200006000-00003 · Cited by 1,143
Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review
Herrett, E., Thomas, S. L., Schoonen, W. M., Smeeth, L., & Hall, A. J. (2010) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03537.x · Cited by 1,109
Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study
Croft, P. R., Macfarlane, G. J., Papageorgiou, A. C., Thomas, E., & Silman, A. J. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7141.1356 · Cited by 700
Gore, M., Sadosky, A., Stacey, B., Tai, K.-S., & Leslie, D. (2012) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e318241e5de · Cited by 650
Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databases
Khan, N., Perera, R., Harper, S., & Rose, P. W. (2010) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-11-1 · Cited by 396
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 2009, Drug Ther Bull, 47, 102
- Hollowell, 1997, Popul Trends, 87, 36
- Negrini, 2006, Eura Medicophys, 42, 151
- Mapel, 2004, J Rheumatol, 31, 573
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–210 of 210
Kumari, R., Singh, N. R., Varsakiya, J. N., & Goyal, M. R. (2024) · AYUHOM · doi:10.4103/ayuhom.ayuhom_52_23
Liao, J., Song, Z., Xu, H., Li, Y., Xu, D., Tian, H., Dai, Z., & Tong, W. (2025) · Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/10538127251392826
Banerjee, A., Hendrick, P., & Blake, H. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22614407
Collard, V. E. J., Moore, C., Nichols, V. P., Ellard, D. R., Patel, S., Sandhu, H., Parsons, H., Sharma, U., Underwood, M. R., Madan, J. J., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.16834981
Auliffe, S. M., Wilson, F., Foley, G., Smith, S. M., Maxwell, A., Daly, R., & O'Sullivan, K. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0339053
Schneider, J. E. (2026) · Global perspectives on wealth and distribution · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-20355-7_4
Malam, F., Asif, S., Khalid, F., Leafloor, C. W., Hong, P. J., Levit, T., Zeraatkar, D., Wang, L., Couban, R., Agarwal, A., et al. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102122
Assistive technologies (lumbar supports and other devices) for treating chronic low back pain
Arienti, C., Lazzarini, S. G., Zaina, F., Cordani, C., Farra, F. D., Minozzi, S., Kiekens, C., & Négrini, S. (2026) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd015492.pub2
Chen, M., Hou, H., Yuan, Y., Zhang, X.-X., Yan, H., Ge, P., Che, Y., Yang, J., & Wang, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1882922
Yang, F., Feng, C., Li, G., Deng, J., Gou, Y., Yang, B., Zhang, Y., Zhou, X., Leng, C., Luo, M., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2026.1935597
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, J., Reed, C., Novick, D., & Happich, M.
- Affiliations
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- Eli Lilly (Germany) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Hong, Jihyung
- ORCID
- Reed, Catherine
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-82
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039594564
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 7.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Spine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Keywords
- chronic low back pain, health care costs, economic burden, primary care visits, secondary care referral, resource utilization (health care), United Kingdom
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual, Health Care Costs, Low Back Pain, Young Adult, General Practice, Chronic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
