Cited by 43Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

Comparison of the EuroQOL-5D with the Oswestry Disability Index, back and leg pain scores in patients with degenerative lumbar spine pathology

Mueller, Benjamin, Carreon, Leah Y., Glassman, Steven D.·2013·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the response behavior of EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) compared with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and back and leg pain scores. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent changes in policies have highlighted the need for demonstration of both quality and cost effectiveness. In an effort to meet these requirements, surgeons are collecting health-related quality of life and utility data. Unfortunately, the burden of extensive data collection on both physician and patient is considerable. The EQ-5D is a commonly used, easily administered, brief utility measure that can provide both clinical and utility data. The EQ-5D has not yet been validated in spine patients in comparison with established outcome measures. METHODS: EQ-5D, ODI, back and leg pain (0-10) scores were collected as part of standard clinical practice. Spearman rank correlations between the ODI, back and leg pain scores, and the EQ-5D were determined. A subanalysis to determine dimension-specific effects was done. Data were categorized by level of low back disability and level of back and leg pain. RESULTS: Data from 8385 patients (5046 females, 3339 males), mean age 52 (range, 18-96) were analyzed. There was a strong correlation between EQ-5D and ODI (r = -0.776) and between EQ-5D and back pain (r = -0.648); and moderate correlation between EQ-5D and leg pain scores (r = -0.538). Increasing disability, as measured by ODI, lead to lower EQ-5D scores, with similar response behavior for both back and leg pain scores. All correlations were statistically significant at P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: The EQ-5D correlated well with established spine outcome measures, including ODI, and back and leg pain scores. EQ-5D correlated best with ODI scores. Correlation with back pain was stronger than leg pain, but all correlations were relatively strong. The EQ-5D can serve spine surgeons as an effective measure of clinical outcome and health utility for economic analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/brs.0b013e31827ab803

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mueller, B., Carreon, L. Y., & Glassman, S. D.
Affiliations
Norton Leatherman Spine (US)
Corresponding author
Carreon, Leah Y.
Venue
Spine
Published
2013-04
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
757-761
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976418676
Cited by
43
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Spine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Keywords
EuroQol-5D, EQ-5D, Oswestry Disability Index, back pain, leg pain, lumbar degenerative disease, health-related quality of life, health utility, outcome measure correlation, low back disability, spinal surgery outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Back Pain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Leg, Lumbar Vertebrae, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult, Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review