Cited by 114COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Metabolomics Profiling of Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: Identification of Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers

Open access
Fraser, Douglas D., Slessarev, Marat, Martin, Claudio M., Daley, Mark, Patel, Maitray A., Miller, Michael R., Patterson, Eric K., O’Gorman, David B. +4 more·2020·Critical Care Explorations

Abstract

Objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 continues to spread rapidly with high mortality. We performed metabolomics profiling of critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients to understand better the underlying pathologic processes and pathways, and to identify potential diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers. Design: Blood was collected at predetermined ICU days to measure the plasma concentrations of 162 metabolites using both direct injection-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance. Setting: Tertiary-care ICU and academic laboratory. Subjects: Patients admitted to the ICU suspected of being infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, using standardized hospital screening methodologies, had blood samples collected until either testing was confirmed negative on ICU day 3 (coronavirus disease 2019 negative) or until ICU day 10 if the patient tested positive (coronavirus disease 2019 positive). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Age- and sex-matched healthy controls and ICU patients that were either coronavirus disease 2019 positive or coronavirus disease 2019 negative were enrolled. Cohorts were well balanced with the exception that coronavirus disease 2019 positive patients suffered bilateral pneumonia more frequently than coronavirus disease 2019 negative patients. Mortality rate for coronavirus disease 2019 positive ICU patients was 40%. Feature selection identified the top-performing metabolites for identifying coronavirus disease 2019 positive patients from healthy control subjects and was dominated by increased kynurenine and decreased arginine, sarcosine, and lysophosphatidylcholines. Arginine/kynurenine ratio alone provided 100% classification accuracy between coronavirus disease 2019 positive patients and healthy control subjects (p = 0.0002). When comparing the metabolomes between coronavirus disease 2019 positive and coronavirus disease 2019 negative patients, kynurenine was the dominant metabolite and the arginine/kynurenine ratio provided 98% classification accuracy (p = 0.005). Feature selection identified creatinine as the top metabolite for predicting coronavirus disease 2019-associated mortality on both ICU days 1 and 3, and both creatinine and creatinine/arginine ratio accurately predicted coronavirus disease 2019-associated death with 100% accuracy (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Metabolomics profiling with feature classification easily distinguished both healthy control subjects and coronavirus disease 2019 negative patients from coronavirus disease 2019 positive patients. Arginine/kynurenine ratio accurately identified coronavirus disease 2019 status, whereas creatinine/arginine ratio accurately predicted coronavirus disease 2019-associated death. Administration of tryptophan (kynurenine precursor), arginine, sarcosine, and/or lysophosphatidylcholines may be considered as potential adjunctive therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/cce.0000000000000272

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • KP activation during viral infections such as VEEV may drive the pathological interplay of inflammation and KYN dysregulation in the development or exacerbation of neurodegeneration.

    “This indicates KP activation during viral infections such as VEEV may drive the pathological interplay of inflammation and KYN dysregulation in the development or exacerbation of neurodegeneration [28,29,30].”

    From VEEV TC-83 Triggers Dysregulation of the Tryptophan–Kynurenine Pathway in the Central Nervous System That Correlates with Cognitive Impairment in Tg2576 Mice (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) links immune activation in critically ill COVID-19 patients to increased plasma kynurenine, supporting the inflammation–kynurenine part of the claim. The paper does not address VEEV or whether kynurenine-pathway activation contributes to the development or exacerbation of neurodegeneration. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. [3]Bhatraju PK Ghassemieh BJ Nichols M: Covid-19 in critically ill patients in the Seattle region - case series. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 2012– 2022 32227758 PMC7143164
  2. [4]Zhou F Yu T Du R: Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395: 1054– 1062 32171076 PMC7270627
  3. [5]Wu C Chen X Cai Y: Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180: 934– 943 32167524 PMC7070509
  4. [8]Mehta P McAuley DF Brown M; HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK: COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020; 395: 1033– 1034 32192578 PMC7270045
  5. [9]Fraser DD Cepinskas G Slessarev M: Inflammation profiling of critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Crit Care Explor 2020; 2: e0144 32696007 PMC7314329
  6. [10]Fraser DD Patterson EK Slessarev M: Endothelial injury and glycocalyx degradation in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients: Implications for microvascular platelet aggregation. Crit Care Explor 2020; 2: e0194 32904031 PMC7449254
  7. [11]Auld SC Caridi-Scheible M Blum JM: ICU and ventilator mortality among critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019. Crit Care Med 2020; 48: e799– e804 32452888 PMC7255393
  8. [12]Fraser DD Cepinskas G Patterson EK: Novel outcome biomarkers identified with targeted proteomic analyses of plasma from critically ill Coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Crit Care Explor 2020; 2: e0189 32904064 PMC7449255
  9. [13]Bujak R Struck-Lewicka W Markuszewski MJ: Metabolomics for laboratory diagnostics. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2015; 113: 108– 120 25577715
  10. [14]Daley M Dekaban G Bartha R: Metabolomics profiling of concussion in adolescent male hockey players: A novel diagnostic method. Metabolomics 2016; 12: 185
  11. [18]Priestap F Kao R Martin CM: External validation of a prognostic model for intensive care unit mortality: A retrospective study using the Ontario Critical Care Information System. Can J Anaesth 2020; 67: 981– 991 32383124 PMC7223438
  12. [19]Singer M Deutschman CS Seymour CW: The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315: 801– 810 26903338 PMC4968574
  13. [20]Brisson AR Matsui D Rieder MJ: Translational research in pediatrics: Tissue sampling and biobanking. Pediatrics 2012; 129: 153– 162 22144705
  14. [21]Gillio-Meina C Cepinskas G Cecchini EL: Translational research in pediatrics II: Blood collection, processing, shipping, and storage. Pediatrics 2013; 131: 754– 766 23509173
  15. [23]Foroutan A Fitzsimmons C Mandal R: The bovine metabolome. Metabolites 2020; 10: 233 PMC7345087 32517015
  16. [24]Foroutan A Guo AC Vazquez-Fresno R: Chemical composition of commercial cow’s milk. J Agric Food Chem 2019; 67: 4897– 4914 30994344
  17. [25]Psychogios N Hau DD Peng J: The human serum metabolome. PLoS One 2011; 6: e16957 21359215 PMC3040193
  18. [26]Saude EJ Slupsky CM Sykes BD: Optimization of NMR analysis of biological fluids for quantitative accuracy. Metabolomics 2006; 2: 113– 123
  19. [27]Ravanbakhsh S Liu P Bjorndahl TC: Accurate, fully-automated NMR spectral profiling for metabolomics. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0124219 26017271 PMC4446368
  20. [28]van der Maaten L Hinton G: Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res 2008; 9: 2579– 2605
  21. [29]Tang C Garreau D von Luxburg U: When do random forests fail? In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2018: 2987– 2997
  22. [30]Chen Y Guillemin GJ: Kynurenine pathway metabolites in humans: Disease and healthy States. Int J Tryptophan Res 2009; 2: 1– 19 22084578 PMC3195227
  23. [31]De Biasi S Meschiari M Gibellini L: Marked T cell activation, senescence, exhaustion and skewing towards TH17 in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 3434 32632085 PMC7338513
  24. [32]Chen Z John Wherry E: T cell responses in patients with COVID-19. Nat Rev Immunol 2020; 20: 529– 536 32728222 PMC7389156
  25. [33]Akerström S Mousavi-Jazi M Klingström J: Nitric oxide inhibits the replication cycle of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol 2005; 79: 1966– 1969 15650225 PMC544093
  26. [34]Mondanelli G Iacono A Allegrucci M: Immunoregulatory interplay between arginine and tryptophan metabolism in health and disease. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 1565 31354721 PMC6629926
  27. [35]Alexander JW Supp DM: Role of arginine and omega-3 fatty acids in wound healing and infection. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2014; 3: 682– 690 25371851 PMC4217020
  28. [36]Dastmalchi F Karachi A Yang C: Sarcosine promotes trafficking of dendritic cells and improves efficacy of anti-tumor dendritic cell vaccines via CXC chemokine family signaling. J Immunother Cancer 2019; 7: 321 31753028 PMC6873439
  29. [37]Walters RO Arias E Diaz A: Sarcosine is uniquely modulated by aging and dietary restriction in rodents and humans. Cell Rep 2018; 25: 663– 676.e6 30332646 PMC6280974
  30. [38]Carmona-Gutierrez D Bauer MA Zimmermann A: Digesting the crisis: Autophagy and coronaviruses. Microb Cell 2020; 7: 119– 128 32391393 PMC7199282
  31. [39]Li X Fang P Li Y: Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species mediate lysophosphatidylcholine-induced endothelial cell activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2016; 36: 1090– 1100 27127201 PMC4882253
  32. [41]Mecatti GC Fernandes Messias MC Sant’Anna Paiola RM: Lipidomic profiling of plasma and erythrocytes from septic patients reveals potential biomarker candidates. Biomark Insights 2018; 13: 1177271918765137 29623000 PMC5882049
  33. [42]Cunningham TJ Yao L Lucena A: Product inhibition of secreted phospholipase A2 may explain lysophosphatidylcholines’ unexpected therapeutic properties. J Inflamm (Lond) 2008; 5: 17 18945345 PMC2580763
  34. [43]Clermont G Acker CG Angus DC: Renal failure in the ICU: Comparison of the impact of acute renal failure and end-stage renal disease on ICU outcomes. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 986– 996 12164882
  35. [44]Wysocki J Lores E Ye M: Kidney and lung ACE2 expression after an ACE inhibitor or an Ang II receptor blocker: Implications for COVID-19. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 31: 1941– 1943 32669323 PMC7461678
  36. [46]Farkash EA Wilson AM Jentzen JM: Ultrastructural evidence for direct renal infection with SARS-CoV-2. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 31: 1683– 1687 32371536 PMC7460898

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fraser, D. D., Slessarev, M., Martin, C. M., Daley, M., Patel, M. A., Miller, M. R., Patterson, E. K., O’Gorman, D. B., Gill, S. E., Wishart, D. S., Mandal, R., & Cepinskas, G.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Lawson Health Research Institute (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Fraser, Douglas D.
Venue
Critical Care Explorations
Published
2020-10
Volume
2
Issue
10
Pages
e0272
ISSN
2639-8028 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094237064
Cited by
114
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care Explorations (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, critically ill patients, plasma metabolomics, diagnostic biomarkers, prognostic factors, kynurenine, creatinine, mortality prediction, sarcosine, lysophosphatidylcholine, bilateral pneumonia, feature selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review