Cited by 181Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyEthics in medical practice

Cost Associated with Pediatric Delirium in the ICU

Open access
Traube, Chani, Mauer, Elizabeth A., Gerber, Linda M., Kaur, Savneet, Joyce, Christine, Kerson, Abigail, Carlo, Charlene, Notterman, Daniel +3 more·2016·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the costs associated with delirium in critically ill children. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: An urban, academic, tertiary-care PICU in New York city. PATIENTS: Four-hundred and sixty-four consecutive PICU admissions between September 2, 2014, and December 12, 2014. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All children were assessed for delirium daily throughout their PICU stay. Hospital costs were analyzed using cost-to-charge ratios, in 2014 dollars. Median total PICU costs were higher in patients with delirium than in patients who were never delirious ($18,832 vs $4,803; p < 0.0001). Costs increased incrementally with number of days spent delirious (median cost of $9,173 for 1 d with delirium, $19,682 for 2-3 d with delirium, and $75,833 for > 3 d with delirium; p < 0.0001); this remained highly significant even after adjusting for PICU length of stay (p < 0.0001). After controlling for age, gender, severity of illness, and PICU length of stay, delirium was associated with an 85% increase in PICU costs (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric delirium is associated with a major increase in PICU costs. Further research directed at prevention and treatment of pediatric delirium is essential to improve outcomes in this population and could lead to substantial healthcare savings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002004

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even after accounting for illness severity, delirium is associated with increased short- and long-term morbidity, leading to higher healthcare resource utilization and expenditure, and mortality.

    “Even after accounting for illness severity, delirium is associated with increased short- and long-term morbidity, leading to higher healthcare resource utilization and expenditure, and mortality [7,61,64,65,66].”

    From Psychological and Psychiatric Comorbidities in Youth with Serious Physical Illness (2022) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Discussion reports that pediatric delirium was associated with higher PICU costs and resource use after controlling for illness severity and length of stay. The Introduction describes short- and long-term health effects, but the Limitations say consequences after discharge require further study. The paper does not establish the claimed link to mortality or show that morbidity causes the increased expenditure (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Traube, C., Mauer, E. A., Gerber, L. M., Kaur, S., Joyce, C., Kerson, A., Carlo, C., Notterman, D., Worgall, S., Silver, G., & Greenwald, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2016-12
Volume
44
Issue
12
Pages
e1175-e1179
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2514395058
Cited by
181
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
15.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000457)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD047879)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
pediatric delirium, intensive care unit costs, pediatric intensive care unit, hospital costs, cost-to-charge ratio, critically ill children, length of hospital stay, health care costs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Delirium, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Prospective Studies, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric, Hospital Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review