Performance of a modern glucose meter in ICU and general hospital inpatients: 3 years of real-world paired meter and central laboratory results
Abstract
Objective Due to accuracy concerns, the Food and Drug Administration issued guidances to manufacturers that resulted in Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services stating that the use of meters in critically ill patients is "off-label" and constitutes "high complexity" testing. This is causing significant workflow problems in ICUs nationally. We wished to determine whether real-world accuracy of modern glucose meters is worse in ICU patients compared with non-ICU inpatients. Design We reviewed glucose results over the preceding 3 years, comparing results from paired glucose meter and central laboratory tests performed within 60 minutes of each other in ICU versus non-ICU settings. Setting Seven ICU and 30 non-ICU wards at a 1,300-bed academic hospital in the United States. Subjects A total of 14,763 general medicine/surgery inpatients and 20,970 ICU inpatients. Interventions None. Measurements and main results Compared meter results with near simultaneously performed laboratory results from the same patient by applying the 2016 U.S. Food and Drug Administration accuracy criteria, determining mean absolute relative difference and examining where paired results fell within the Parkes consensus error grid zones. A higher percentage of glucose meter results from ICUs than from non-ICUs passed 2016 Food and Drug Administration accuracy criteria (p Conclusions Real-world accuracy of modern glucose meters is at least as accurate in the ICU setting as in the non-ICU setting at our ins…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The balance between analytic requirements (e.g., accuracy, precision, and interference) and clinical requirements (e.g., rapidity, simplicity, and POC) has not been uniformly resolved, and most hospitals have arrived at their own policies to balance these parameters.
“The balance between analytic requirements (e.g., accuracy, precision, and interference) and clinical requirements (e.g., rapidity, simplicity, and POC) has not been uniformly resolved (39)(40)(41)(42), and most hospitals have arrived at their own policies to balance these parameters.”
From 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [41]
POC blood glucose monitors provide the advantage of immediate bedside results, and studies suggest that while POC measurements are less accurate and less precise than those from laboratory glucose analyzers, they provide adequate information for usual practice except in rare instances where care has been compromised.
“POC blood glucose monitors provide the advantage of immediate bedside results, and studies suggest that while POC measurements are less accurate and less precise than those from laboratory glucose analyzers, they provide adequate information for usual practice except in rare instances where care has been compromised (40,41).”
From 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [41]
Cites
Analytic evaluation of a new glucose meter system in 15 different critical care settings
Mitsios, J. V., Ashby, L. A., Haverstick, D. M., Bruns, D. E., & Scott, M. G. (2013) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681300700518 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*, Bajaj, M., McCoy, R. G., Balapattabi, K., Bannuru, R. R., Bellini, N. J., Bennett, A. K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., ChallaSivaKanaka, S., et al. (2026) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc26-s016 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, R., Isakow, W., Kollef, M. H., & Scott, M. G.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1509-1514
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2655571343
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- blood glucose meters, blood glucose monitoring, meter accuracy, central laboratory comparison, intensive care unit, error grid analysis, critical illness, point-of-care testing
- MeSH terms
- Academic Medical Centers, Blood Glucose, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Reference Standards, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Point-of-Care Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review