Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 850

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting outcome in patients with severe sepsis and evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of emergency department presentation*

Open access
Jones, Alan E., Trzeciak, Stephen, Kline, Jeffrey A.·2009·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Organ failure worsens outcome in sepsis. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score numerically quantifies the number and severity of failed organs. We examined the utility of the SOFA score for assessing outcome of patients with severe sepsis with evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of emergency department (ED) presentation. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Urban, tertiary ED with an annual census of >110,000. PATIENTS: ED patients with severe sepsis with evidence of hypoperfusion. INCLUSION CRITERIA: suspected infection, two or more criteria of systemic inflammation, and either systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg after a fluid bolus or lactate >or=4 mmol/L. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: age <18 years or need for immediate surgery. INTERVENTIONS: SOFA scores were calculated at ED recognition (T0) and 72 hours after intensive care unit admission (T72). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive ability of SOFA scores at each time point. The relationship between Delta SOFA (change in SOFA from T0 to T72) was examined for linearity. RESULTS: A total of 248 subjects aged 57 +/- 16 years, 48% men, were enrolled over 2 years. All patients were treated with a standardized quantitative resuscitation protocol; the in-hospital mortality rate was 21%. The mean SOFA score at T0 was 7.1 +/- 3.6 points and at T72 was 7.4 +/- 4.9 points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SOFA for predicting in-hospital mortality at T0 was 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.68-0.83) and at T72 was 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.90). The Delta SOFA was found to have a positive relationship with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The SOFA score provides potentially valuable prognostic information on in-hospital survival when applied to patients with severe sepsis with evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of ED presentation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819def97

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 850

Metadata

Authors
Jones, A. E., Trzeciak, S., & Kline, J. A.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2009-05
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
1649-1654
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060970919
Cited by
850
References
29
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting outcome in patients with severe sepsis and evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of emergency department presentation*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819def97
The paper
Jones, A. E., Trzeciak, S., & Kline, J. A. (2009). The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting outcome in patients with severe sepsis and evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of emergency department presentation*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819def97

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.