Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Presence and severity of intensive care unit-acquired paresis at time of awakening are associated with increased intensive care unit and hospital mortality*

Sharshar, Tarek, Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie, Stevens, Robert D., Durand, Marie-Christine, Malissin, Isabelle, Rodriguez, Pablo, Cerf, Charles, Outin, Hervé, De Jonghe, Bernard·2009·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the presence and severity of intensive care unit-acquired paresis are associated with intensive care unit and in-hospital mortality. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Two medical, one surgical, and one medico-surgical intensive care units in two university hospitals and one university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 115 consecutive patients were enrolled after > 7 days of mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Medical Research Council score (from 0-60) was used to evaluate upper and lower limb strength at time of awakening, identified as the ability to follow five commands. Intensive care unit-acquired paresis was defined as a Medical Research Council score <48. Patients were followed-up until hospital discharge. The primary end point was hospital mortality. At awakening, median Medical Research Council score was 41 (interquartile range, 21-52), and 75 (65%) patients had intensive care unit-acquired paresis. Hospital non-survivors had a significantly lower Medical Research Council score at awakening (21 [11-43]) vs. 41 [28-53]; p = .008) and a significantly higher rate of intensive care unit-acquired paresis (85.1% vs. 58.4%; p = .02) compared to survivors. After multivariate risk adjustment, intensive care unit-acquired paresis was independently associated with higher hospital and intensive care unit mortality (odds ratio for hospital mortality, 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-8.03; p = .048). Each Medical Research Council point decrease was associated with a significantly higher hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.05; p = .033). CONCLUSIONS: Both the presence and severity of intensive care unit-acquired paresis at the time of awakening are associated with increased intensive care unit and hospital mortality; the mechanisms underlying this association need further study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b027e9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Sharshar, T., Bastuji-Garin, S., Stevens, R. D., Durand, M.-C., Malissin, I., Rodriguez, P., Cerf, C., Outin, H., & De Jonghe, B.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2009-12
Volume
37
Issue
12
Pages
3047-3053
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041638411
Cited by
268
References
4
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Presence and severity of intensive care unit-acquired paresis at time of awakening are associated with increased intensive care unit and hospital mortality*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b027e9
The paper
Sharshar, T., Bastuji-Garin, S., Stevens, R. D., Durand, M.-C., Malissin, I., Rodriguez, P., Cerf, C., Outin, H., & De Jonghe, B. (2009). Presence and severity of intensive care unit-acquired paresis at time of awakening are associated with increased intensive care unit and hospital mortality*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b027e9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.