The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical care medicine in the United States 2000–2005: An analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs*
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the evolving role, patterns of use, and costs of critical care medicine in the United States from 2000 to 2005. DESIGN: Retrospective study of data from the Hospital Cost Report Information System (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland). SETTING: Nonfederal, acute care hospitals with critical care medicine beds in the United States. SUBJECTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed hospital and critical care medicine beds, bed types, days, occupancy rates, payer mix (Medicare and Medicaid), and costs. Critical care medicine costs were compared with national cost indexes. Between 2000 and 2005, the total number of U.S. hospitals with critical care medicine beds decreased by 12.2% (from 3,586 to 3,150). Although the number of hospital beds decreased by 4.2% (from 655,785 to 628,409), both hospital days and occupancy rates increased by 5.1% (from 145.1 to 152.5 million) and 13.7% (from 59% to 67%), respectively. Critical care medicine beds increased by 6.5% (from 88,252 to 93,955), days by 10.6% (from 21.0 to 23.2 million), and occupancy rates by 4.5% (from 65% to 68%). The majority (90%) of critical care medicine beds were classified as intensive care, premature/neonatal, and coronary care unit beds. The percentage of critical care medicine days used by Medicare decreased by 3.8% (from 37.9% to 36.5%) compared with an increase of 15.5% (from 14.5% to 16.8%) by Medicaid. From 2000 to 2005, critical care medicine costs per day increased by 30.4% (from $2698 to $3518). Although annual critical care medicine costs increased by 44.2% (from $56.6 to $81.7 billion), the proportion of hospital costs and national health expenditures allocated to critical care medicine decreased by 1.6% and 1.8%, respectively. However, the proportion of the gross domestic product used by critical care medicine increased by 13.7%. In 2005, critical care medicine costs represented 13.4% of hospital costs, 4.1% of national health expenditures, and 0.66% of the gross domestic product. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care medicine continues to grow in a shrinking U.S. hospital system. The critical care medicine payer mix is evolving, with Medicaid increasing in its percentage of critical care medicine use. Critical care medicine is more cost controlled than other healthcare indexes, but is still using an increasing percentage of the gross domestic product. Our updated and comprehensive critical care medicine use and cost analysis provides a contemporary benchmark for the strategic planning of critical care medicine services within the U.S. healthcare system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Costs of adverse events in intensive care units*
Kaushal, R., Bates, D. W., Franz, C., Soukup, J. R., & Rothschild, J. M. (2007) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000284510.04248.66 · Cited by 100
Cited by
Hospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007
Lagu, T., Rothberg, M. B., Shieh, M.-S., Pekow, P. S., Steingrub, J. S., & Lindenauer, P. K. (2012) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e318232db65 · Cited by 679
Jackson, J. C., Pandharipande, P. P., Girard, T. D., Brummel, N. E., Thompson, J. L., Hughes, C. G., Pun, B. T., Vasilevskis, E. E., Morandi, A., Shintani, A. K., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70051-7 · Cited by 673
Pirracchio, R., Petersen, M. L., Carone, M., Rigon, M. R., Chevret, S., & van der Laan, M. J. (2015) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70239-5 · Cited by 374
Three-Year Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries Who Survive Intensive Care
Wunsch, H. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.216 · Cited by 386
Cleveland, A. A., Farley, M. M., Harrison, L. H., Stein, B., Hollick, R., Lockhart, S. R., Magill, S. S., Derado, G., Park, B. J., & Chiller, T. M. (2012) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cis697 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Halpern, N. A., & Pastores, S. M.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-71
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072492033
- Cited by
- 817
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 82.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical care medicine in the United States 2000–2005: An analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b090d0
- The paper
- Halpern, N. A., & Pastores, S. M. (2010). Critical care medicine in the United States 2000–2005: An analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b090d0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.