Cited by 679Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentAbdominal Surgery and ComplicationsAcute Kidney Injury Research

Hospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007

Lagu, Tara, Rothberg, Michael B., Shieh, Meng-Shiou, Pekow, Penelope S., Steingrub, Jay S., Lindenauer, Peter K.·2012·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Objectives To assess trends in number of hospitalizations, outcomes, and costs of severe sepsis in the United States. Design Temporal trends study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients Adult patients with severe sepsis (defined as a diagnosis of sepsis and organ dysfunction) diagnosed between 2003 and 2007. Measurements and main results We determined the weighted frequency of patients hospitalized with severe sepsis. We calculated age- and sex-adjusted population-based mortality rates for severe sepsis per 100,000 population and also used logistic regression to adjust in-hospital mortality rates for patient characteristics. We calculated inflation-adjusted costs using hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios. We identified a rapid steady increase in the number of cases of severe sepsis, from 415,280 in 2003 to 711,736 in 2007 (a 71% increase). The total hospital costs for all patients with severe sepsis increased from $15.4 billion in 2003 to $24.3 billion in 2007 (57% increase). The proportion of patients with severe sepsis and only a single organ dysfunction decreased from 51% in 2003 to 45% in 2007 (p Conclusions The increase in the number of hospitalizations for severe sepsis coupled with declining in-hospital mortality and declining geometric mean cost per case may reflect improvements in care or increases in discharges to skilled nursing facilities; however, these findings more likely represent changes in documentation and hospital coding practices that could b…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318232db65

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lagu, T., Rothberg, M. B., Shieh, M.-S., Pekow, P. S., Steingrub, J. S., & Lindenauer, P. K.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2012-03
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
754-761
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019952254
Cited by
679
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 15
FWCI
28.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Abdominal Surgery and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
severe sepsis, hospitalization trends, hospital costs, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, organ dysfunction, sepsis surveillance, skilled nursing facilities, cost per case, National Inpatient Sample, temporal trends, healthcare quality improvement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Costs and Cost Analysis, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, United States, Treatment Outcome, Sepsis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review