The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nutritional practices and their relationship to clinical outcomes in critically ill children—An international multicenter cohort study*
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine factors influencing the adequacy of energy and protein intake in the pediatric intensive care unit and to describe their relationship to clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated children. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: We conducted an international prospective cohort study of consecutive children (ages 1 month to 18 yrs) requiring mechanical ventilation longer than 48 hrs in the pediatric intensive care unit. Nutritional practices were recorded during the pediatric intensive care unit stay for a maximum of 10 days, and patients were followed up for 60 days or until hospital discharge. Multivariate analysis, accounting for pediatric intensive care unit clustering and important confounding variables, was used to examine the impact of nutritional variables and pediatric intensive care unit characteristics on 60-day mortality and the prevalence of acquired infections. MAIN RESULTS: 31 pediatric intensive care units in academic hospitals in eight countries participated in this study. Five hundred patients with mean (SD) age 4.5 (5.1) yrs were enrolled and included in the analysis. Mortality at 60 days was 8.4%, and 107 of 500 (22%) patients acquired at least one infection during their pediatric intensive care unit stay. Over 30% of patients had severe malnutrition on admission, with body mass index z-score >2 (13.2%) or <-2 (17.1%) on admission. Mean prescribed goals for daily energy and protein intake were 64 kcals/kg and 1.7 g/kg respectively. Enteral nutrition was used in 67% of the patients and was initiated within 48 hrs of admission in the majority of patients. Enteral nutrition was subsequently interrupted on average for at least 2 days in 357 of 500 (71%) patients. Mean (SD) percentage daily nutritional intake (enteral nutrition) compared to prescribed goals was 38% for energy and 43% (44) for protein. A higher percentage of goal energy intake via enteral nutrition route was significantly associated with lower 60-day mortality (Odds ratio for increasing energy intake from 33.3% to 66.6% is 0.27 [0.11, 0.67], p = .002). Mortality was higher in patients who received parenteral nutrition (odds ratio 2.61 [1.3, 5.3], p = .008). Patients admitted to units that utilized a feeding protocol had a lower prevalence of acquired infections (odds ratio 0.18 [0.05, 0.64], p = .008), and this association was independent of the amount of energy or protein intake. CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition delivery is generally inadequate in mechanically ventilated children across the world. Intake of a higher percentage of prescribed dietary energy goal via enteral route was associated with improved 60-day survival; conversely, parenteral nutrition use was associated with higher mortality. Pediatric intensive care units that utilized protocols for the initiation and advancement of enteral nutrient intake had a lower prevalence of acquired infections. Optimizing nutrition therapy is a potential avenue for improving clinical outcomes in critically ill children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McClave, S. A., Martindale, R. G., Vanek, V. W., McCarthy, M., Roberts, P., Taylor, B., Ochoa, J. B., Napolitano, L., Cresci, G., the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors, et al. (2009) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1177/0148607109335234 · Cited by 1,873
Taylor, B. E., McClave, S. A., Martindale, R. G., Warren, M. M., Johnson, D. R., Braunschweig, C., McCarthy, M. S., Davanos, E., Rice, T. W., Cresci, G. A., et al. (2016) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000001525 · Cited by 1,476
Negative impact of hypocaloric feeding and energy balance on clinical outcome in ICU patients
Villet, S., Chiolero, R. L., Bollmann, M. D., Revelly, J.-P., Cayeux RN, M.-C., Delarue, J., & Berger, M. M. (2005) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2005.03.006 · Cited by 995
Alberda, C., Gramlich, L., Jones, N., Jeejeebhoy, K., Day, A. G., Dhaliwal, R., & Heyland, D. K. (2009) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1567-4 · Cited by 975
Self-citation
Cited by
Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill children
Fivez, T., Kerklaan, D., Mesotten, D., Verbruggen, S., Wouters, P. J., Vanhorebeek, I., Debaveye, Y., Vlasselaers, D., Desmet, L., Casaer, M. P., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1514762 · Cited by 558
Mehta, N. M., Skillman, H. E., Irving, S. Y., Coss‐Bu, J. A., Vermilyea, S., Farrington, E. A., McKeever, L., Hall, A. M., Goday, P. S., & Braunschweig, C. (2017) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1177/0148607117711387 · Cited by 503
Self-citationTume, L. N., Valla, F. V., Joosten, K., Jotterand Chaparro, C., Latten, L., Marino, L. V., Macleod, I., Moullet, C., Pathan, N., Rooze, S., et al. (2020) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-019-05922-5 · Cited by 313
Are prospective cohort studies an appropriate tool to answer clinical nutrition questions?
Vincent, J.-L., & Preiser, J.-C. (2013) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/mco.0b013e32835d803e · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Mehta, N. M., Bechard, L. J., Cahill, N., Wang, M., Day, A., Duggan, C. P., & Heyland, D. K.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2204-2211
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087758209
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional practices and their relationship to clinical outcomes in critically ill children—An international multicenter cohort study*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31824e18a8
- The paper
- Mehta, N. M., Bechard, L. J., Cahill, N., Wang, M., Day, A., Duggan, C. P., & Heyland, D. K. (2012). Nutritional practices and their relationship to clinical outcomes in critically ill children—An international multicenter cohort study*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31824e18a8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.