Cited by 45Emergency and Acute Care StudiesArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareMachine Learning in Healthcare

Building a Decision Support System for Inpatient Admission Prediction With the Manchester Triage System and Administrative Check-in Variables

Zlotnik, Alexander, Alfaro, Miguel Cuchí, Pérez, María Carmen Pérez, Gallardo-Antolín, Ascensión, Martínez, Juan Manuel Montero·2016·CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing

Abstract

The usage of decision support tools in emergency departments, based on predictive models, capable of estimating the probability of admission for patients in the emergency department may give nursing staff the possibility of allocating resources in advance. We present a methodology for developing and building one such system for a large specialized care hospital using a logistic regression and an artificial neural network model using nine routinely collected variables available right at the end of the triage process.A database of 255.668 triaged nonobstetric emergency department presentations from the Ramon y Cajal University Hospital of Madrid, from January 2011 to December 2012, was used to develop and test the models, with 66% of the data used for derivation and 34% for validation, with an ordered nonrandom partition. On the validation dataset areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.8568 (95% confidence interval, 0.8508-0.8583) for the logistic regression model and 0.8575 (95% confidence interval, 0.8540-0. 8610) for the artificial neural network model. χ Values for Hosmer-Lemeshow fixed "deciles of risk" were 65.32 for the logistic regression model and 17.28 for the artificial neural network model. A nomogram was generated upon the logistic regression model and an automated software decision support system with a Web interface was built based on the artificial neural network model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/cin.0000000000000230

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zlotnik, A., Alfaro, M. C., Pérez, M. C. P., Gallardo-Antolín, A., & Martínez, J. M. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
Venue
CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing
Published
2016-05
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
224-230
ISSN
1538-2931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2335120868
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CIN Computers Informatics Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
Manchester Triage System, emergency department triage, decision support system, artificial neural networks, logistic regression, nomogram, emergency department resource allocation, web-based decision support
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Data Collection, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Operations Research, Spain, Triage, Models, Statistical, Neural Networks, Computer, Risk Assessment, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review