Building a Decision Support System for Inpatient Admission Prediction With the Manchester Triage System and Administrative Check-in Variables
Abstract
The usage of decision support tools in emergency departments, based on predictive models, capable of estimating the probability of admission for patients in the emergency department may give nursing staff the possibility of allocating resources in advance. We present a methodology for developing and building one such system for a large specialized care hospital using a logistic regression and an artificial neural network model using nine routinely collected variables available right at the end of the triage process.A database of 255.668 triaged nonobstetric emergency department presentations from the Ramon y Cajal University Hospital of Madrid, from January 2011 to December 2012, was used to develop and test the models, with 66% of the data used for derivation and 34% for validation, with an ordered nonrandom partition. On the validation dataset areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.8568 (95% confidence interval, 0.8508-0.8583) for the logistic regression model and 0.8575 (95% confidence interval, 0.8540-0. 8610) for the artificial neural network model. χ Values for Hosmer-Lemeshow fixed "deciles of risk" were 65.32 for the logistic regression model and 17.28 for the artificial neural network model. A nomogram was generated upon the logistic regression model and an automated software decision support system with a Web interface was built based on the artificial neural network model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nurses are target users of predictive CDSSs in the hospital setting.
“However, nurses are also target users of predictive CDSSs in the hospital setting [7,16]”
From Factors influencing clinician trust in predictive clinical decision support systems for in-hospital deterioration: qualitative descriptive study (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predicted Influences of Artificial Intelligence on Nursing Education: Scoping Review
Buchanan, C., Howitt, M. L., Wilson, R., Booth, R. G., Risling, T., & Bamford, M. (2021) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/23933 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Predicting hospital admission at the emergency department triage: A novel prediction model
Parker, C. A., Liu, N., Wu, S. X., Shen, Y., Lam, S. S. W., & Ong, M. E. H. (2019) · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.060 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Schwartz, J. M., George, M., Rossetti, S. C., Dykes, P. C., Minshall, S. R., Lucas, E., & Cato, K. D. (2022) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/33960 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“However, nurses are also target users of predictive CDSSs in the hospital setting [7,16] and may have different perceptions of and requirements for trusting predictive CDSSs.”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence in Nursing Decision-Making: A Bibliometric Analysis of Trends and Impacts
Hu, M., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Cai, B., Kong, F., Zheng, Q., Zhao, D., Gao, G., & Hui, Z. (2025) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep15060198 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zlotnik, A., Alfaro, M. C., Pérez, M. C. P., Gallardo-Antolín, A., & Martínez, J. M. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
- Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
- Venue
- CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 224-230
- ISSN
- 1538-2931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2335120868
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CIN Computers Informatics Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- Manchester Triage System, emergency department triage, decision support system, artificial neural networks, logistic regression, nomogram, emergency department resource allocation, web-based decision support
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Data Collection, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Operations Research, Spain, Triage, Models, Statistical, Neural Networks, Computer, Risk Assessment, Decision Support Systems, Clinical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review