Cited by 100Emergency and Acute Care StudiesHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationMachine Learning in Healthcare

Predicting hospital admission at the emergency department triage: A novel prediction model

Parker, Clare Allison, Liu, Nan, Wu, Stella Xinzi, Shen, Yuzeng, Lam, Sean Shao Wei, Ong, Marcus Eng Hock·2019·The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Background Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a growing international patient safety issue. A major contributor to overcrowding is long wait times for inpatient hospital admission. The objective of this study is to create a model that can predict a patient's need for hospital admission at the time of triage.Methods Retrospective observational study of electronic clinical records of all ED visits over ten years to a large urban hospital in Singapore. The data was randomly divided into a derivation set and a validation set. We used the derivation set to develop a logistic regression model that predicts probability of hospital admission for patients presenting to the ED. We tested the model on the validation set and evaluated the performance with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results A total of 1,232,016 visits were included for final analysis, of which 38.7% were admitted. Eight variables were included in the final model: age group, race, postal code, day of week, time of day, triage category, mode of arrival, and fever status. The model performed well on the validation set with an area under the curve of 0.825 (95% CI 0.824-0.827). Increasing age, increasing triage acuity, and mode of arrival via private patient transport were most predictive of the need for admission.Conclusions We developed a model that accurately predicts admission for patients presenting to the ED using demographic, administrative, and clinical data routinely collected at triage. Implementation of the model into the electronic health record could help reduce the burden of overcrowding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.060

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, C. A., Liu, N., Wu, S. X., Shen, Y., Lam, S. S. W., & Ong, M. E. H.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • SingHealth (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Liu, Nan
Venue
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
37
Issue
8
Pages
1498-1504
ISSN
0735-6757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898892062
Cited by
100
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
FWCI
10.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
hospital admission prediction, emergency department overcrowding, emergency department triage, logistic regression, triage acuity, mode of arrival, patient transport, fever, electronic health record implementation, patient safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Support Techniques, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Singapore, Triage, Logistic Models, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review