The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hepatotoxicity After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Melanoma: Natural Progression and Management
Abstract
Objective: To report the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced hepatotoxicity. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we identified patients with metastatic malignant melanoma seen in consultation and/or treated between March 2011 and March 2016. Hepatotoxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v4.0. Results: Seventeen patients were identified as having any degree of hepatotoxicity by history (grade 1 to 4). Twelve of 17 were diagnosed after ipilimumab, 3 of 17 were diagnosed after pembrolizumab, and 2 of 17 after ipilimumab combined with nivolumab. Median time from first dose of immune therapy to hepatotoxicity was 52 days. Clinical symptoms were variable: asymptomatic, fatigue, myalgias, headache, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, confusion, and/or jaundice. Eight patients had concurrent adverse events including colitis, hypophysitis, pneumonitis, and/or rash. Immune therapy was discontinued in all patients except 3. The patients were most commonly treated with systemic corticosteroids such as prednisone. Immunosuppression was discontinued by taper over a median of 42 days; in 3 patients steroids had to be reinitiated based on clinical or laboratory worsening of liver tests. Normalization of liver tests was seen within a median of 31 days of immunosuppression initiation. One patient with grade 4 hepatotoxicity had normalization with the addition of cyclosporine. Conclusions: Melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors should be monitored regularly for hepatotoxicity. Treatment with discontinuation of therapy and initiation of corticosteroids is indicated with grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity. Cyclosporine may be beneficial in steroid-refractory hepatotoxicity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More than half of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-related hepatotoxicity have extrahepatic immune-related adverse events.
“More than half of patients with ICI-related hepatotoxicity have extrahepatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) [158]”
From Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [158]
Citations
Cites
Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
Robert, C., Schachter, J., Long, G. V., Arance, A., Grob, J. J., Mortier, L., Daud, A., Carlino, M. S., McNeil, C., Lotem, M., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1503093 · Cited by 5,887
Nivolumab in Previously Untreated Melanoma without BRAF Mutation
Robert, C., Long, G. V., Brady, B., Dutriaux, C., Maio, M., Mortier, L., Hassel, J. C., Rutkowski, P., McNeil, C., Kalinka-Warzocha, E., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1412082 · Cited by 5,519
Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events and Kinetics of Response With Ipilimumab
Weber, J. S., Kähler, K. C., & Hauschild, A. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.41.6750 · Cited by 1,415 · cited 2×
“patients 3 1 8 3 17w Onset of hepatotoxicity (median [range]) (d)z 43 (16-63) 46 53 (20-112) 64 (42-151) 52 (16-151) Resolution of hepatotoxicity (median [range]) (d)y 21 (21) 6 38 (24-56) 50 (50) 31 (6-56) Treatment No treatment 1 0 0 0 1”
Attia, P., Phan, G. Q., Maker, A. V., Robinson, M. R., Quezado, M. M., Yang, J. C., Sherry, R. M., Topalian, S. L., Kammula, U. S., Royal, R. E., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.06.205 · Cited by 1,012
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Larkin, 2015, Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma, N Engl J Med, 373, 23, 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030 · DOI · Paper page
- Weber, 2015, Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial, Lancet Oncol, 16, 375, 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70076-8 · DOI
- Spain, 2016, Management of toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors, Cancer Treat Rev, 44, 51, 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Quirk, 2015, Immune-mediated adverse events of anticytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 antibody therapy in metastatic melanoma, Transl Res, 166, 412, 10.1016/j.trsl.2015.06.005 · DOI
- Kim, 2013, Ipilimumab associated hepatitis: imaging and clinicopathologic findings, Invest New Drugs, 31, 1071, 10.1007/s10637-013-9939-6 · DOI
- Johncilla, 2015, Ipilimumab-associated Hepatitis: Clinicopathologic Characterization in a Series of 11 Cases, Am J Surg Pathol, 39, 1075, 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000453 · DOI
- Weber, 2013, Patterns of onset and resolution of immune-related adverse events of special interest with ipilimumab: detailed safety analysis from a phase 3 trial in patients with advanced melanoma, Cancer, 119, 1675, 10.1002/cncr.27969 · DOI
- Hofmann, 2016, Cutaneous, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine, and renal side-effects of anti-PD-1 therapy, Eur J Cancer, 60, 190, 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.025 · DOI
- Horvat, 2015, Immune-Related Adverse Events, Need for Systemic Immunosuppression, and Effects on Survival and Time to Treatment Failure in Patients With Melanoma Treated With Ipilimumab at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, J Clin Oncol, 33, 3193, 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8448 · DOI · Paper page
- Yousaf, 2015, The cost of ipilimumab toxicity: a single-centre analysis, Melanoma Res, 25, 259, 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000158 · DOI
- Downey, 2007, Prognostic factors related to clinical response in patients with metastatic melanoma treated by CTL-associated antigen-4 blockade, Clin Cancer Res, 13, 6681, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0187 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Drug-induced liver injury
Andrade, R. J., Aithal, G. P., Björnsson, E. S., Kaplowitz, N., Kullak-Ublick, G. A., Larrey, D., & Karlsen, T. H. (2019) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.014 · Cited by 1,276
Drug-induced liver injury—types and phenotypes
Hoofnagle, J. H., & Björnsson, E. S. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1816149 · Cited by 652
Thompson, J. A., Schneider, B. J., Brahmer, J., Andrews, S., Armand, P., Bhatia, S., Budde, L. E., Costa, L., Davies, M., Dunnington, D., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0013 · Cited by 570
Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update
Mao, Y., Ma, S., Liu, C., Liu, X., Su, M., Li, D., Li, Y., Chen, G., Chen, J., Chen, J., et al. (2024) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-023-10633-7 · Cited by 62
New advances in the study of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors-induced liver injury
Yue, M., Li, C., & Li, G. (2024) · International Immunopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111799 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Huffman, B. M., Kottschade, L. A., Kamath, P. S., & Markovic, S. N.
- Venue
- American Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 760-765
- ISSN
- 0277-3732
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review