The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence by Anatomic Site and Disease Stage in the United States From 1976 to 2005
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the current study were to examine the trends in incidence rates of subsite-specific colorectal cancer at all stages in a large US population and to explore the impact of age and sex on colorectal cancer incidence. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 9 registries. Colorectal cancer incidence was divided into 3 anatomic subsite groupings: proximal colon, distal colon, and rectum. Incidence rates and relative risk were calculated using the SEER*Stat software provided by the National Cancer Institute. RESULTS: From 1976 to 2005, age-adjusted incidence of proximal colon, distal colon, and rectal cancers per 100,000 population have steadily decreased from 22.5, 18.8, and 19.2 to 21.1, 11.7, and 13.6, respectively, contributing to the overall decline in the incidence of colorectal cancer from 60.5 to 46.4. Distal colon cancer had the greatest incidence decline (-37.79%), whereas the most minimal change in the incidence rates occurred for proximal colon cancer (-6.37%) because of increased incidence rates of ascending colon (24.8%) and hepatic flexure (21.3%) over 30 years. The steadily increased proportion of proximal colorectal cancer subsites was observed in both men and women starting at age 50 although women experienced a greater increase than did men. CONCLUSIONS: Overall incidence rate of colorectal cancer decreased over the past 3 decades. The percent of ascending colon and hepatic flexure cancers diagnosed at early stages (localized and regional) increased. The finding on sex difference over years suggests that great attention should be paid in the future studies to male and female disparities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Hao, Y., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2009) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20006 · Cited by 9,709
Cited by
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colon Cancer, Version 2.2018
Benson, A. B., Venook, A. P., Al-Hawary, M. M., Cederquist, L., Chen, Y.-J., Ciombor, K. K., Cohen, S., Cooper, H. S., Deming, D., Engstrom, P. F., et al. (2018) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2018.0021 · Cited by 806
Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal carcinoma tissue according to tumor location
Mima, K., Cao, Y., Chan, A. T., Qian, Z. R., Nowak, J. A., Masugi, Y., Shi, Y., Song, M., da Silva, A., Gu, M., et al. (2016) · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ctg.2016.53 · Cited by 284
Increasing Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults
Loomans-Kropp, H. A., & Umar, A. (2019) · Journal of Cancer Epidemiology · doi:10.1155/2019/9841295 · Cited by 148
Sagdicoglu Celep, A. G., Demirkaya, A., & Solak, E. K. (2022) · Current Applied Physics · doi:10.1016/j.cap.2020.06.002 · Cited by 58
Screening and Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer: A Review of the Literature
Maida, M., Dahiya, D. S., Shah, Y. R., Tiwari, A., Gopakumar, H., Vohra, I., Khan, A., Jaber, F., Ramai, D., & Facciorusso, A. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16152746 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, L., Eng, C., Nieman, L. Z., Kapadia, A. S., & Du, X. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 573-580
- ISSN
- 0277-3732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966402141
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence by Anatomic Site and Disease Stage in the United States From 1976 to 2005. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/coc.0b013e3181fe41ed
- The paper
- Cheng, L., Eng, C., Nieman, L. Z., Kapadia, A. S., & Du, X. L. (2011). Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence by Anatomic Site and Disease Stage in the United States From 1976 to 2005. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1097/coc.0b013e3181fe41ed
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.