Cited by 63Family and Disability Support ResearchChild and Adolescent HealthInfant Development and Preterm Care

Examining Parents' Experiences and Information Needs Regarding Early Identification of Developmental Delays: Qualitative Research to Inform a Public Health Campaign

Open access
Raspa, Melissa, Levis, Denise M., Kish-Doto, Julia, Wallace, Ina, Rice, Catherine, Barger, Brian, Green, Katie K., Wolf, Rebecca B.·2015·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the approach and materials of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's "Learn the Signs. Act Early." (LTSAE) health education campaign, which aims to improve awareness of developmental milestones and early warning signs of developmental delay among parents of young children. METHODS: We conducted 2 phases of qualitative research. Focus groups assessed the campaign's objectives by exploring the experiences of parents with children who have developmental delays or disabilities to determine facilitators of and barriers to identification. In-depth interviews were conducted with parents of typically developing children, who reviewed campaign materials and provided feedback on appropriateness, appeal, and clarity with regard to the campaign's objectives. RESULTS: Phase 1: Parents were typically the first to express concern about their child's development, and most talked with their child's health care provider. Two categories of health care providers emerged: those who proactively asked about a child's development, used tools to facilitate conversations, and made referrals, and those who did not ask about development, told parents to "wait and see," and did not provide information about services and supports. Few parents knew about special education services before identification. Phase 2: Participants found the campaign materials appealing, but were unclear about how to act early and why acting early was important. CONCLUSIONS: Results affirmed LTSAE's evidence-based approach to educating parents about child development. Additional campaign considerations include providing more information about how to act early and why acting early is important and enhancing outreach to providers to help them communicate with concerned parents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/dbp.0000000000000205

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lists based on median (50th percentile) age milestones might encourage a wait-and-see approach because half of children are not expected to achieve the milestone by that age.

    “For example, lists based on median (50th percentile) age milestones might encourage a wait-and-see5 approach because half of children are not expected to achieve the milestone by that age.”

    From Evidence-Informed Milestones for Developmental Surveillance Tools (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results (Phase 1: Focus Group Findings; page unavailable) report that some providers told parents to “wait and see” after they raised developmental concerns. The paper does not link that advice to lists based on median-age milestones or discuss the claim that half of children have not reached a milestone at its median age. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Use of the same strategy is intended to discourage the wait-and-see approach and could prevent worry for children older than the average age of attainment of a milestone but not likely to be at risk for delays.

    “Use of this same strategy is intended to discourage the wait-and-see approach and could prevent worry for children older than the average age of attainment of a milestone but not likely to be at risk for delays.1,5”

    From Evidence-Informed Milestones for Developmental Surveillance Tools (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results (Phase 2: In-Depth Interview Findings; page unavailable) say the materials encouraged parents not to wait or ignore possible developmental problems. The Discussion also reports parents’ negative experiences with providers’ “wait and see” responses. Neither passage addresses preventing worry in children older than the average age of milestone attainment who are unlikely to have delays. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The CDC checklists support developmental surveillance and other important components of the early identification process by pediatricians and other early childhood professionals, including developmental promotion, parent education and engagement, communication of developmental progress and concerns, and developmental screening.

    “The CDC checklists support developmental surveillance and other important components of the early identification process by pediatricians and other ECPs, including developmental promotion, parent education and engagement, communication of developmental progress and concerns, and developmental screening.7,5,9,72–75”

    From Evidence-Informed Milestones for Developmental Surveillance Tools (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results (Phase 1: Focus Group Findings; page unavailable) describe the CDC Milestones checklist as an aid for parents monitoring development, and the Discussion says such materials can help parents discuss concerns with providers. The paper also links the campaign to asking providers about screening, but it discusses developmental screening tools separately; it does not establish that the CDC checklists themselves support screening by pediatricians and other early childhood professionals. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Bornstein MH Cote LR Knowledge of child development and family interactions among immigrants to America: perspectives from developmental science Lansford JE Deater-Ceckard K Bornstein MH Immigrant Families in Contemporary Society New York, NY Guildford Press 2007 121 136

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raspa, M., Levis, D. M., Kish-Doto, J., Wallace, I., Rice, C., Barger, B., Green, K. K., & Wolf, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • RTI International (US)
Corresponding author
  • Raspa, Melissa
  • Wallace, Ina
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2015-10
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
575-585
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2410011031
Cited by
63
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (200-2007-20016/020)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
developmental delay, early detection, parental experiences, parental information needs, developmental milestones, early warning signs, provider communication, special education services, campaign materials, children with disabilities
MeSH terms
Adult, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Developmental Disabilities, Female, Health Education, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Parents, Public Health, United States, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review