Cited by 30Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Adolescent HealthChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Autism and General Developmental Screening Practices Among Primary Care Providers

Mazurek, Micah O., Kuhlthau, Karen, Parker, Robert A., Chan, James, Sohl, Kristin·2021·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective: Using standardized screening tools increases accuracy in early identification of autism. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends systematic developmental screening at all 9-, 18-, and 24- or 30-month well-child visits (WCVs) and autism-specific screening at all 18- and 24-month WCVs. The study objectives were to examine the extent to which these guidelines have been adopted in practice among primary care providers (PCPs) and to identify potential provider-level factors associated with screening practices. Method: Participants included 94 PCPs (79% pediatricians) from 13 states enrolled in a study of an autism training program. Self-report and chart-review data collected before training were examined. Screening practices were assessed through chart review of all 9-, 18-, and 24-month WCVs within a 30-day window. Results: Sixty-four percent of PCPs administered developmental screening tools at all 9-month WCVs, and 62% at all 18-month WCVs. Fifty-one percent administered autism screening tools at all 18-month WCVs, and 41% at all 24-month WCVs. Screening practices varied by provider type (pediatrician vs other PCP), self-efficacy in screening and identification, and previous autism training (autism screening only), but not by years of experience. Conclusion: Overall, general developmental and autism-specific screenings are not being consistently administered across recommended WCVs in primary care practices. Provider self-efficacy in autism identification and screening and previous autism training were associated with increased autism screening. As such, these results suggest a need for increased training and dissemination of information on screening implementation for practicing PCPs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/dbp.0000000000000909

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mazurek, M. O., Kuhlthau, K., Parker, R. A., Chan, J., & Sohl, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Mazurek, Micah O.
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2021-01-25
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
355-362
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123963388
Cited by
30
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism screening, developmental screening, primary care providers, pediatricians, well-child visits, guideline adherence, provider self-efficacy, autism training, early detection of autism
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Health Personnel, Humans, Mass Screening, Primary Health Care, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review