Cited by 370Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesChild and Animal Learning Development

Early identification of autism spectrum disorders

Zwaigenbaum, Lonnie, Bryson, Susan, Garon, Nancy·2013·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Earlier identification and diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) can improve opportunities for children to benefit from intervention and lessen the burden on concerned parents. This review summarizes current knowledge about early signs of autism. Convergent data from both retrospective studies and prospective studies of high-risk infants indicate that ASD symptoms emerge in the first two years of life, affecting multiple developmental domains, mapping onto symptom dimensions consistent with current diagnostic frameworks including social-communication, and repetitive interests/behaviors but also extending to motor delays and atypical regulation of attention and emotion. Recent findings have shed new light on patterns of symptom onset and progression, and promise to inform early detection and diagnosis. Further attention to effective application of new findings and related challenges in building health system capacity to ensure timely access to specialized assessment and interventions is needed to fully realize the promise of improved outcomes resulting from this research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.004

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent reviews find convergent evidence for emergence of overt behavioural markers between 12 and 18 months of age that distinguish, at a group level, infants who go on to receive an ASD diagnosis from other HR infants and low-risk groups.

    “Recent reviews of high-risk (HR) sibling studies find convergent evidence for the emergence of overt behavioural markers between 12 and 18 months of age that distinguish, at a group level, those infants who go on to receive an ASD diagnosis from other HR infants and low-risk (LR) groups (Jones, Gliga, Bedford, Charman, & Johnson, 2014; Zwaigenbaum et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 114 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zwaigenbaum, L., Bryson, S., & Garon, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Mount Allison University (CA)
Corresponding author
Zwaigenbaum, Lonnie
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
251
Pages
133-146
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130157722
Cited by
370
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 10
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, early detection, early diagnosis, early signs of autism, high-risk infants, social communication, repetitive behavior, motor delay, attentional control, emotion regulation, developmental domains, health system capacity
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Communication, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review