Cited by 84Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Survival Bias in Mendelian Randomization Studies: A Threat to Causal Inference

Open access
Smit, Roelof A. J., Trompet, Stella, Dekkers, Olaf M., Jukema, J. Wouter, le Cessie, Saskia·2019·Epidemiology

Abstract

It has been argued that survival bias may distort results in Mendelian randomization studies in older populations. Through simulations of a simple causal structure we investigate the degree to which instrumental variable (IV)-estimators may become biased in the context of exposures that affect survival. We observed that selecting on survival decreased instrument strength and, for exposures with directionally concordant effects on survival (and outcome), introduced downward bias of the IV-estimator when the exposures reduced the probability of survival till study inclusion. Higher ages at study inclusion generally increased this bias, particularly when the true causal effect was not equal to null. Moreover, the bias in the estimated exposure-outcome relation depended on whether the estimation was conducted in the one- or two-sample setting. Finally, we briefly discuss which statistical approaches might help to alleviate this and other types of selection bias. See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B589.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0000000000001072

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Study participation is heritable and influenced by a number of different traits, and large studies such as the UK Biobank have high levels of selection in those who participate.

    “Study participation has shown to be heritable and is influenced by a number of different traits, and large studies such as the UK Biobank have been shown to have high levels of selection in those who participate.31,170–172”

    From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [170]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smit, R. A. J., Trompet, S., Dekkers, O. M., Jukema, J. W., & le Cessie, S.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Department of Clinical Epidemiology, LUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Smit, Roelof A. J.
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2019-11
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
813-816
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2965936319
Cited by
83
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
survivorship bias, Mendelian randomization, selection bias, older population, causal inference
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Computer Simulation, Humans, Bias, Selection Bias, Causality, Survival Rate, Mendelian Randomization Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review