Cited by 413Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesData Analysis with RBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

CMAverse: A Suite of Functions for Reproducible Causal Mediation Analyses

Shi, Baoyi, Choirat, Christine, Coull, Brent A., VanderWeele, Tyler J., Valeri, Linda·2021·Epidemiology

Abstract

To the Editor: In this letter, we introduce CMAverse, an R package that provides a suite of functions for reproducible causal mediation analysis including directed acyclic graph (DAG) visualization, statistical modeling for estimation and inference of causal effects, and sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding, measurement error and selection bias. In many research fields including biomedical sciences, epidemiology and psychology, the use of causal mediation analysis has been increasing rapidly over the past couple of decades. Mediation analysis can help explain causal relationships and inform policy. In addition to examining a direct causal relation between two variables, mediation models assess causal pathways in which one variable (the exposure) causes another variable (the outcome) through an intermediate variable (the mediator). It has been shown that the overall exposure effect can be decomposed into two components1: a natural direct effect and a natural indirect effect. Additionally, in the presence of exposure–mediator interaction, the overall exposure effect can be further decomposed into four effects1: a controlled direct effect, a reference interaction, a mediated interaction and a pure indirect effect. These decompositions yield valid results under a set of assumptions of no unmeasured confounding. In practice, there might be violations of these such assumptions, which are also untestable. Meanwhile, there might be measurement error and selection bias incu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0000000000001378

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Less access to testing can be a barrier to early and effective isolation support among individuals living in lower-income neighbourhoods, which can lead to onward transmission from undiagnosed infections, and therefore more COVID-19 deaths in lower-income neighbourhoods.

    “Less access to testing can be a barrier to early and effective isolation support among individuals living in lower-income neighbourhoods, which can lead to onward transmission from undiagnosed infections, and therefore more COVID-19 deaths in lower-income neighbourhoods(39,40).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, B., Choirat, C., Coull, B. A., VanderWeele, T. J., & Valeri, L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Shi, Baoyi
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2021-05-21
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
e20-e22
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3165488072
Cited by
413
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 140 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 6
FWCI
30.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH118477)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Analysis with R
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
causal mediation analysis, R package, directed acyclic graphs, natural direct and indirect effects, sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding, measurement error, selection bias, time-varying confounders, multiple mediators, smoking, lung cancer
MeSH terms
Mediation Analysis, Humans, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review