Deficits in information transfer between anaesthesiologist and postanaesthesia care unit staff: an analysis of patient handover
Abstract
Background The immediate postoperative period is important, as the patient recovers from the acute derangements resulting from the surgical insult and anaesthesia. Incomplete or incorrect communication between the anaesthesiologist and the postanaesthesia care unit nurse during the transfer process may lead to dangerous clinical mistakes. The literature examining handovers from operating room to the postanaesthesia care unit is scarce. Objectives The primary objective of this study was to examine the current transfer practice through observation of handovers between the anaesthesiologists and the postanaesthesia care unit staff in order to identify data omissions. The secondary objective was to learn which data items the clinicians and nurses thought were a necessary part of the transfer process and whether this information was communicated at the time of handover. Design A prospective observational study. Setting Academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. Participants and interventions After Research Ethics Board approval, a prospective observational study was conducted at a university-affiliated teaching centre. During a 2-month period, multiple observations of patient handover were performed. The data provided were marked on a checklist. At the end of the study, participating nurses and physicians were surveyed regarding the necessity of communicating different items on the checklist. Results A total of 526 transfers were observed. Of 29 data items examined, only two items (typ…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Handoff-related information gaps are common for postoperative patients.
“Nevertheless, handoff-related information gaps are common for postoperative patients.10,25–28”
From Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
Cites
A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population
Haynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., Lipsitz, S. R., Breizat, A.-H. S., Dellinger, E. P., Herbosa, T., Joseph, S., Kibatala, P. L., Lapitan, M. C. M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0810119 · Cited by 5,688 · see citing works
Medical Errors Involving Trainees: A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims From 5 Insurers
Singh, H., Thomas, E. J., Petersen, L. A., & Studdert, D. M. (2007) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.167.19.2030 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study
King, C. R., Shambe, A., & Abraham, J. (2023) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad015 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Siddiqui, N., Arzola, C., Iqbal, M., Sritharan, K., Guerina, L., Chung, F., & Friedman, Z.
- Affiliations
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Siddiqui, Naveed
- Venue
- European Journal of Anaesthesiology
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 438-445
- ISSN
- 0265-0215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096294890
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Anaesthesiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Toronto
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
- Keywords
- patient handover, information transmission, postoperative care, data omission, handover checklist, handover protocol, patient safety, nurse-physician communication
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anesthesia Recovery Period, Anesthesiology, Communication, Continuity of Patient Care, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Transfer, Prospective Studies, Recovery Room
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review