The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berg, J. S., Brunetti-Pierri, N., Peters, S. U., Kang, S.-H. L., Fong, C.-T., Salamone, J., Freedenberg, D., Hannig, V. L., Prock, L. A., Miller, D. T., et al. (2007) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/gim.0b013e3180986192 · Cited by 193
Cited by
Robson, M. E., Bradbury, A. R., Arun, B., Domchek, S. M., Ford, J. M., Hampel, H. L., Lipkin, S. M., Syngal, S., Wollins, D. S., & Lindor, N. M. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.0996 · Cited by 934
Berg, J. S., Khoury, M. J., & Evans, J. P. (2011) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/gim.0b013e318220aaba · Cited by 490
Beyond Diagnostic Accuracy: The Clinical Utility of Diagnostic Tests
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Linnet, K., & Moons, K. G. (2012) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2012.182576 · Cited by 330
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing
Horton, R., Crawford, G., Freeman, L., Fenwick, A., Wright, C. F., & Lucassen, A. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l5688 · Cited by 151
The future of precision medicine: potential impacts for health technology assessment
Love-Koh, J., Peel, A., Rejon-Parrilla, J. C., Ennis, K., Lovett, R., Manca, A., Chalkidou, A., Wood, H., & Taylor, M. (2018) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-018-0686-6 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Foster, M. W., Mulvihill, J. J., & Sharp, R. R.
- Venue
- Genetics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 570-574
- ISSN
- 1098-3600 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978144064
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/gim.0b013e3181a2743e
- The paper
- Foster, M. W., Mulvihill, J. J., & Sharp, R. R. (2009). Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information. Genetics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/gim.0b013e3181a2743e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
