The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Facilitating lifestyle changes to manage menopausal symptoms in women with breast cancer: a randomized controlled pilot trial of The Pink Women's Wellness Program
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Women diagnosed as having breast cancer may experience difficulties with posttreatment effects such as menopausal symptoms. The aims of this pilot study were to (1) evaluate the impact of a multimodal lifestyle program on reducing menopausal symptoms in women with breast cancer and (2) examine the impact of the program on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adherence to lifestyle recommendations. METHODS: Overall, 55 women aged 45 to 60 years with one moderate to severe menopausal symptom and a history of breast cancer were randomized into an intervention group (n = 26) or a control group (n = 29). Women in the intervention group received a lifestyle intervention (The Pink Women's Wellness Program) that included clinical consultations and a tailored health education program. Measurements of menopausal symptoms (Greene Climacteric Scale), HRQoL (SF-12 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast), and modifiable lifestyle factors (food intake, physical activity, smoking and alcohol use, and sleep disturbance) were taken at baseline and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Women in the intervention group reported clinically significant reductions in many menopausal symptoms, specifically somatic symptoms (d = 0.52), vasomotor symptoms (d = 0.55), sexual dysfunction (d = .65), and overall menopausal symptoms (d = 0.54), at 12 weeks compared with the control group (d = 0.03, d = 0.24, d = 0.18, and d = 0.05, respectively). Women in the intervention group reported improvements in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast subscale scores, physical well-being and functional well-being, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General total scores (intervention group: d = 0.54, d = 0.50, and d = 0.48, respectively; control group: d = 0.22, d = 0.11, and d = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The Pink Women's Wellness Program is effective in decreasing menopausal symptoms, thus improving HRQoL. This being a pilot study, further research is recommended to investigate the benefits of combining nonpharmacological interventions for women with breast cancer to reduce their treatment-related menopausal symptoms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Pink Women's Wellness Program led to significantly more reduction in mood symptoms and improvement in quality of life than control.”
From The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on non-physiological symptoms of menopause: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as *Anderson et al. (2015)
In the citing paper
“The Pink Women's Wellness Program led to significantly more reduction in mood symptoms and improvement in quality of life than control.”
From The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on non-physiological symptoms of menopause: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as *Anderson et al. (2015)
In the citing paper
“Interventions that were less effective include the structured education program on stress management (Augoulea et al., 2021), health promotion coaching (Fujimoto, 2017), and the Pink Women's Wellness Program (Anderson et al., 2015).”
From The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on non-physiological symptoms of menopause: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Anderson et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research
Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 · Cited by 35,234
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity
CRAIG, C. L., MARSHALL, A. L., SJ??STR??M, M., BAUMAN, A. E., BOOTH, M. L., AINSWORTH, B. E., PRATT, M., EKELUND, U., YNGVE, A., SALLIS, J. F., et al. (2003) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000078924.61453.fb · Cited by 21,619
WARE, J. E., KOSINSKI, M., & KELLER, S. D. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · Cited by 17,392
Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means
Bandura, A. (2004) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198104263660 · Cited by 7,238
Rosen, C. B. (2000) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/009262300278597 · Cited by 6,593
Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough
Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-12-00156.1 · Cited by 5,553
A Rating Instrument For Anxiety Disorders
Zung, W. W. K. (1971) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(71)71479-0 · Cited by 4,578
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer
Turner, R. R., Steed, L., Quirk, H., Greasley, R., Saxton, J., Taylor, S. J., Rosario, D. J., Thaha, M. A., & Bourke, L. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010192.pub3 · Cited by 239
Managing Menopausal Symptoms and Associated Clinical Issues in Breast Cancer Survivors
Santen, R. J., Stuenkel, C. A., Davis, S. R., Pinkerton, J. V., Gompel, A., & Lumsden, M. A. (2017) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2017-01138 · Cited by 128
Management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in breast cancer survivors: An update
López, D. M. L. (2022) · World Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.5306/wjco.v13.i2.71 · Cited by 99
Sheeran, P., Abraham, C., Jones, K., Villegas, M. E., Avishai, A., Symes, Y. R., Ellinger, H., Miles, E., Gates, K. M., Wright, C. E., et al. (2019) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000712 · Cited by 90
Anderson, D. J., Seib, C. A., Tjondronegoro, D., Turner, J., Monterosso, L., McGuire, A., Porter‐Steele, J., Song, W., Yates, P. M., King, N. A., et al. (2017) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3088-9 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, D. J., Seib, C., McCarthy, A. L., Yates, P., Porter-Steele, J., McGuire, A., & Young, L.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Anderson, Debra J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Menopause
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 937-945
- ISSN
- 1072-3714 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315217616
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
- Keywords
- breast cancer, menopausal symptoms, lifestyle intervention, health-related quality of life, vasomotor symptoms, sexual dysfunction, somatic symptoms, physical activity, sleep disorders, smoking and alcohol use, dietary intake, health education
- MeSH terms
- Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Life Style, Menopause, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Health Behavior, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
