Cited by 134Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 133 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychology of Chronic Pelvic Pain: Prevalence, Neurobiological Vulnerabilities, and Treatment

Open access
TILL, SARA R., AS-SANIE, SAWSAN, SCHREPF, ANDREW·2019·Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Patients with pelvic pain suffer from psychological conditions at a disproportionately high rate compared with their peers. We review environmental, genetic, inflammatory, and neurobiological factors that increase vulnerability to developing both of these conditions. We review treatment strategies for chronic pelvic pain in patients who have comorbid psychological conditions, including both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic options.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/grf.0000000000000412

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 134 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 134

Metadata

Authors
TILL, S. R., AS-SANIE, S., & SCHREPF, A.
Affiliations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
TILL, SARA R.
Venue
Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2019-03
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
22-36
ISSN
0009-9201 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898956426
Cited by
134
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (K12DE023574)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD088712)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
chronic pelvic pain, psychological comorbidity, prevalence, neurobiological vulnerability, genetic factors, inflammation, pain management, non-pharmacological treatment, pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors, Gabapentin, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Prevalence, Pelvic Pain, Twin Studies as Topic, Off-Label Use, Catastrophization, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review