The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Noninvasive 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We systematically assessed the evidence regarding the association between noninvasive 24-h systolic blood pressure and incident cardiovascular events. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through April 2007. Studies that prospectively followed at least 100 individuals for at least 1 year, and that reported at least one effect estimate of interest were included. Two independent investigators abstracted information on study design, subject characteristics, blood pressure measurements, outcome assessment, effect estimates, and adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: We identified 20 eligible articles based on 15 independent cohort studies. The association between 24-h systolic blood pressure and a combined cardiovascular endpoint was assessed in nine cohort studies, including 9299 participants who were followed up to 11.1 years and had 881 outcome events. The summary hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) per 10-mmHg increase of 24-h systolic blood pressure was 1.27 (1.18-1.38) (P < 0.001). Further adjustment for office blood pressure in four studies with 4975 participants and 499 outcome events provided a similar summary estimate [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) per 10-mmHg increase of 24-systolic blood pressure 1.21 (1.10-1.33) (P < 0.001)]. Office blood pressure was usually assessed on a single occasion. We found no significant variability according to age, sex, population origin, baseline office blood pressure, follow-up time, diabetes, or study quality. There was a consistent association between 24-h systolic blood pressure and stroke, cardiovascular mortality, total mortality, and cardiac events with hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) per 10 mmHg increase of 24-h systolic blood pressure of 1.33 (1.22-1.44), 1.19 (1.13-1.26), 1.12 (1.07-1.17), and 1.17 (1.09-1.25), respectively. CONCLUSION: 24-h systolic blood pressure is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events, providing prognostic information independent of conventional office blood pressure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dolan, E., Stanton, A., Thijs, L., Hinedi, K., Atkins, N., McClory, S., Hond, E. D., McCormack, P., Staessen, J. A., & O’Brien, E. (2005) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000170138.56903.7a · Cited by 1,227
Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Blood-Pressure Recordings in Patients with Treated Hypertension
Clement, D. L., De Buyzere, M. L., De Bacquer, D. A., de Leeuw, P. W., Duprez, D. A., Fagard, R. H., Gheeraert, P. J., Missault, L. H., Braun, J. J., Six, R. O., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022273 · Cited by 1,085
Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Mortality: A Population-Based Study
Hansen, T. W., Jeppesen, J., Rasmussen, S., Ibsen, H., & Torp-Pedersen, C. (2005) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000160402.39597.3b · Cited by 317
Diagnostic Thresholds for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Based on 10-Year Cardiovascular Risk
Kikuya, M., Hansen, T. W., Thijs, L., Björklund-Bodegård, K., Kuznetsova, T., Ohkubo, T., Richart, T., Torp-Pedersen, C., Lind, L., Ibsen, H., et al. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.662254 · Cited by 314
Ambulatory Blood Pressure for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification
Verdecchia, P., Angeli, F., & Cavallini, C. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.697086 · Cited by 59
Cited by
(2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151 · Cited by 13,655
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Stress and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update on Current Knowledge
Steptoe, A., & Kivimäki, M. (2013) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114452 · Cited by 879
Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
Stevens, S. L., Wood, S., Koshiaris, C., Law, K., Glasziou, P., Stevens, R. J., & McManus, R. J. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i4098 · Cited by 871
Daskalopoulou, S. S., Rabi, D. M., Zarnke, K. B., Dasgupta, K., Nerenberg, K., Cloutier, L., Gelfer, M., Lamarre-Cliche, M., Milot, A., Bolli, P., et al. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2015.02.016 · Cited by 684
Metadata
- Authors
- Conen, D., & Bamberg, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Hypertension
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1290-1299
- ISSN
- 0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072378295
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/hjh.0b013e3282f97854
- The paper
- Conen, D., & Bamberg, F. (2008). Noninvasive 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0b013e3282f97854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.