The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ENHANCED DEPTH IMAGING OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY OF THE CHOROID IN CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the choroidal thickness in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy, a disease attributed to increased choroidal vascular hyperpermeability. METHODS: Patients with central serous chorioretinopathy underwent enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, which was obtained by positioning a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography device close enough to the eye to acquire an inverted image. Seven sections, each comprising 100 averaged scans, were obtained within a 5 degrees x 30 degrees rectangle to encompass the macula. The subfoveal choroidal thickness was measured from the outer border of the retinal pigment epithelium to the inner scleral border. RESULTS: The mean age of subjects undergoing enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was 59.3 years (standard deviation, 15.8 years). Seventeen of 19 patients (89.5%) were men, and 12 (63.2%) patients had bilateral clinical disease. The choroidal thickness measured in 28 eligible eyes of the 19 patients was 505 microm (standard deviation, 124 microm), which was significantly greater than the choroidal thickness in normal eyes (P < or = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography demonstrated a very thick choroid in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. This finding provides additional evidence that central serous chorioretinopathy may be caused by increased hydrostatic pressure in the choroid.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Optical coherence tomography – current and future applications
Adhi, M., & Duker, J. S. (2013) · Current Opinion in Ophthalmology · doi:10.1097/icu.0b013e32835f8bf8 · Cited by 567
Clinical and Morphologic Characteristics of MEK Inhibitor–Associated Retinopathy
Francis, J. H., Habib, L. A., Abramson, D. H., Yannuzzi, L. A., Heinemann, M., Gounder, M. M., Grisham, R. N., Postow, M. A., Shoushtari, A. N., Chi, P., et al. (2017) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.038 · Cited by 141
The suprachoroidal space: from potential space to a space with potential
Moisseiev, E., Loewenstein, A., & Yiu, G. (2016) · Clinical Ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s89784 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- IMAMURA, Y., FUJIWARA, T., MARGOLIS, R., & SPAIDE, R. F.
- Venue
- Retina
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1469-1473
- ISSN
- 0275-004X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2312892038
- Cited by
- 955
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ENHANCED DEPTH IMAGING OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY OF THE CHOROID IN CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/iae.0b013e3181be0a83
- The paper
- IMAMURA, Y., FUJIWARA, T., MARGOLIS, R., & SPAIDE, R. F. (2009). ENHANCED DEPTH IMAGING OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY OF THE CHOROID IN CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0b013e3181be0a83
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.