The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SUBFOVEAL CHOROIDAL THICKNESS IN FELLOW EYES OF PATIENTS WITH CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY
Abstract
In Brief Purpose: To evaluate the subfoveal choroidal thickness in the fellow eyes of patients with CSC, a disease often associated with choroidal vascular hyperpermeability even in eyes without subretinal fluid. Methods: In this observational cross-sectional study, we measured the bilateral subfoveal choroidal thickness in patients with unilateral CSC using enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Areas of choroidal vascular hyperpermeability were visualized with indocyanine green angiography. Results: Sixty-six consecutive Japanese patients (50 men, 16 women; mean age, 52.8 years) with unilateral CSC were examined. The subfoveal choroid in symptomatic eyes was significantly thicker than that in fellow eye (414 ± 109 μm vs. 350 ± 116 μm, P < 0.001, respectively). The subfoveal choroid of eyes with choroidal vascular hyperpermeability was 410 ± 92 μm, which differed significantly (P < 0.001) from the choroid (239 ± 59 μm) of fellow eyes without choroidal vascular hyperpermeability. Conclusion: The subfoveal choroid in the fellow eyes of patients with CSC was thicker in the eyes with choroidal vascular hyperpermeability. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography can assess the effects of choroidal vascular hyperpermeability by measuring the choroidal thickness noninvasively. The subfoveal choroid measured by enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in the fellow eyes of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is thicker in eyes with choroidal vascular hyperpermeability on indocyanine green angiography. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography can evaluate choroidal vascular hyperpermeability noninvasively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Central serous chorioretinopathy: Recent findings and new physiopathology hypothesis
Daruich, A., Matet, A., Dirani, A., Bousquet, E., Zhao, M., Farman, N., Jaisser, F., & Behar-Cohen, F. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.05.003 · Cited by 989
Tan, C. S., Ouyang, Y., Ruiz, H., & Sadda, S. R. (2012) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8782 · Cited by 784
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: Update on Pathophysiology and Treatment
Nicholson, B., Noble, J., Forooghian, F., & Meyerle, C. (2013) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.07.004 · Cited by 649
Optical coherence tomography: Imaging of the choroid and beyond
Mrejen, S., & Spaide, R. F. (2013) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.12.001 · Cited by 477
Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Chinese Subjects
Ding, X., Li, J., Zeng, J., Ma, W., Liu, R., Li, T., Yu, S., & Tang, S. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8076 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Maruko, I., Iida, T., Sugano, Y., Ojima, A., & Sekiryu, T.
- Venue
- Retina
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1603-1608
- ISSN
- 0275-004X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010000363
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SUBFOVEAL CHOROIDAL THICKNESS IN FELLOW EYES OF PATIENTS WITH CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/iae.0b013e31820f4b39
- The paper
- Maruko, I., Iida, T., Sugano, Y., Ojima, A., & Sekiryu, T. (2011). SUBFOVEAL CHOROIDAL THICKNESS IN FELLOW EYES OF PATIENTS WITH CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0b013e31820f4b39
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.