Dissection plane in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique
Abstract
Purpose To find the level of dissection in keratoconic corneas undergoing deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) using the big-bubble technique. Methods In 3 keratoconic eyes that underwent DALK, the operation was converted into penetrating keratoplasty after complete big-bubble formation because of extensive tear in Descemet's membrane (DM) during stromal excision. The corneal stroma and DM taken from these eyes were submitted for light and transmission electron microscopy. Results Both light and transmission electron microscope revealed a thin layer of corneal stroma adhered to DM in all cases. In 2 eyes, the residual stromal thickness was almost constant (6.4 μm and 12.3 μm), whereas it varied from 9.5 μm to 25.8 μm in the other one. Conclusion Dissection plane in DALK using the big-bubble technique can be within corneal stroma rather than exactly between stroma and DM. Various corneal pathologies as well as different techniques of dissection may have influence on this level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When a so-called big bubble is induced during pneumodissection, part of the posterior stroma often adheres to Descemet's membrane, indicating a natural cleavage plane in the stroma about 10 μm above Descemet's membrane.
“when a so-called “big bubble” is induced, part of the posterior stroma often adheres to the Descemet's membrane, and that there is, therefore, a natural cleavage plane in the stroma about 10 μm above Descemet's membrane (Jafarinasab et al., 2010, McKee et al., 2011).”
From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Jafarinasab et al., 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneal structure and transparency
Meek, K. M., & Knupp, C. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.001 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jafarinasab, M. R., Rahmati-Kamel, M., Kanavi, M. R., & Feizi, S.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Labbafinejad (IR)
- Venue
- Cornea
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 388-391
- ISSN
- 0277-3740 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972397860
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cornea (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Keywords
- deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, big bubble technique, dissection plane, keratoconus, Descemet's membrane, corneal stroma, residual stromal thickness
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Corneal Stroma, Descemet Membrane, Dissection, Humans, Keratoconus, Keratoplasty, Penetrating, Corneal Transplantation, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review