Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current understanding of conventional outflow dysfunction in glaucoma

Open access
Stamer, W. Daniel, Acott, Ted S.·2012·Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Regulation of intraocular pressure by the conventional (trabecular) outflow pathway is complicated, involving a myriad of mechanical and chemical signals. In most, intraocular pressure is maintained within a tight range over a lifetime. Unfortunately in some, dysfunction results in ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. In the context of established knowledge, this review summarizes recent investigations of conventional outflow function, with the goal of identifying areas for future inquiry and therapeutic targeting. RECENT FINDINGS: Mechanical stimulation of conventional outflow cells due to intraocular pressure fluctuations impacts contractility, gene expression, pore formation, enzyme activity, and signaling. Numerous local signaling mediators in the conventional pathway such as bioactive lipids, cytokines, nitric oxide, and nucleotides participate in the regulation of outflow. Interestingly outflow through the conventional pathway is not uniform, but segmental, with passageways constantly changing due to focal protease activity of trabecular cells clearing extracellular matrix materials. The relationship between extracellular matrix expression and trabecular meshwork contractility appears to coordinately impact outflow resistance and is the target of a new class of drugs, the Rho kinase inhibitors. SUMMARY: The conventional outflow pathway is a dynamic, pressure-sensitive tissue that is vulnerable to pathology on many fronts, each representing a therapeutic opportunity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/icu.0b013e32834ff23e

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Stamer, W. D., & Acott, T. S.
Venue
Current Opinion in Ophthalmology
Published
2012-03
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
135-143
ISSN
1040-8738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037652817
Cited by
320
References
71
FWCI
15.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current understanding of conventional outflow dysfunction in glaucoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/icu.0b013e32834ff23e
The paper
Stamer, W. D., & Acott, T. S. (2012). Current understanding of conventional outflow dysfunction in glaucoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1097/icu.0b013e32834ff23e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.