Cited by 4Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal MalignanciesGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Feasibility and Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Metastasectomy in the Treatment of Ovarian Metastases From Gastric Cancer

Open access
Lee, Maria, Paek, Jiheum, Lee, San Hui, Yim, Ga Won, Kim, Sang Wun, Kim, Sunghoon, Kim, Jae Hoon, Kim, Young Tae +1 more·2011·International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic metastasectomy (LM) in the treatment of ovarian metastases from gastric cancer and to compare the surgical outcomes with patients who underwent open metastasectomy (OM).Methods The cases of 73 patients who underwent LM (n = 16) or OM (n = 57) were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were diagnosed with gastric cancer and, subsequently, underwent a metastasectomy at Yonsei University Health System between December 2002 and March 2011.Results Sixteen operations were completed laparoscopically with no conversion to laparotomy. Complete cytoreduction surgery was achievable in 13 patients (81.3%). Operating time, complete cytoreduction, and occurrence of perioperative complications were comparable between the 2 groups. The LM group had less blood loss (25 vs 400 mL, P < 0.0001), earlier return to a general diet (3 vs 4 days, P = 0.005), shorter postoperative hospital stay (4.5 vs 7 days, P < 0.0001), and lower postoperative pain scores after 6, 24, and 48 hours than those in the OM group. There were no operative complications in the LM group.Conclusions As a surgical treatment for ovarian metastases from gastric cancer, LM is feasible and provides benefits to patients without detrimental effects on the clinical outcomes for selected patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/igc.0b013e31822620e3

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reduced risk of cancer and cancer mortality observed in studies of metformin users has been consistently in the range of 25% to 30%.

    “The reduced risk of cancer and cancer mortality observed in these studies has been consistently in the range of 25% to 30% [135-139,145-147].”
  • Patients with type 2 diabetes who are prescribed metformin had a lower risk of cancer compared to patients who did not take it.

    “Patients with type 2 diabetes who are prescribed metformin had a lower risk of cancer compared to patients who did not take it.”
  • Diabetic patients with colorectal cancer who were treated with metformin had lower mortality than those not receiving metformin.

    “Diabetic patients with colorectal cancer who were treated with metformin had lower mortality than those not receiving metformin [139].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, M., Paek, J., Lee, S. H., Yim, G. W., Kim, S. W., Kim, S., Kim, J. H., Kim, Y. T., & Nam, E. J.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Nam, Eun Ji
Venue
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
1306-1311
ISSN
1048-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102766511
Cited by
4
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecological Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • AJOU Open Repository (Ajou University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Keywords
ovarian metastasis, gastric cancer, complete cytoreduction, surgical outcomes, perioperative complications, postoperative pain, blood loss, length of hospital stay
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Ovarian Neoplasms, Laparoscopy, Stomach Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review