Cited by 58Bacterial Infections and VaccinesBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingNeonatal and Maternal Infections

Test Characteristics and Interpretation of Cerebrospinal Fluid Gram Stain in Children

Neuman, Mark I., Tolford, Sarah, Harper, Marvin B.·2008·Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few data exist regarding the test characteristics of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Gram stain among children at risk for bacterial meningitis, especially the rate of false positive Gram stain. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children seen in the emergency department of Children's Hospital Boston who had CSF obtained between December 1992 and September 2005. Patients who had ventricular shunts, as well as those who received antibiotics before CSF was obtained were excluded. Test characteristics of CSF Gram stain were assessed using CSF culture as the criterion standard. Patients were considered to have bacterial meningitis if there was either: (1) growth of a pathogen, or (2) growth of a possible pathogen noted on the final CSF culture report and the patient was treated with a course of parenteral antibiotics for 7 days or more without other indication. RESULTS: A total of 17,569 eligible CSF specimens were collected among 16,036 patients during the 13-year study period. The median age of study subjects was 74 days. Seventy CSF specimens (0.4%) had organisms detected on Gram stain. The overall sensitivity of Gram stain to detect bacterial meningitis was 67% [42 of 63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 54-78] with a positive predictive value of 60% (42 of 70; 95% CI: 48-71). Most patients without bacterial meningitis have negative Gram stain [specificity 99.9% (17,478 of 17,506; 95% CI: 99.8-99.9)] with a negative predictive value of 99.9 (17,478 of 17,499; 95% CI: 99.8-99.9). CONCLUSIONS: CSF Gram stain is appropriately used by physicians in risk stratification for the diagnosis and empiric treatment of bacterial meningitis in children. Although a positive Gram stain result greatly increases the likelihood of bacterial meningitis; the result may be because of contamination or misinterpretation in 40% of cases and should not, by itself, result in a full treatment course for bacterial meningitis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/inf.0b013e31815f53ba

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neuman, M. I., Tolford, S., & Harper, M. B.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Neuman, Mark I.
Venue
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Published
2008-04
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
309-313
ISSN
0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987584916
Cited by
57
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Keywords
bacterial meningitis, children, diagnostic accuracy, false positives, cerebrospinal fluid culture, sensitivity and specificity, empirical antibiotic therapy, risk stratification
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Boston, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Child, Preschool, False Positive Reactions, Gentian Violet, Humans, Infant, Phenazines, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cohort Studies, Meningitis, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review