Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Use of the Complete Blood Cell Count in Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis

Open access
Hornik, Christoph P., Benjamin, Daniel K., Becker, Kristian C., Benjamin, Daniel K., Li, Jennifer, Clark, Reese H., Cohen-Wolkowiez, Michael, Smith, P. Brian·2012·Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates, and its diagnosis remains challenging. The complete blood cell count and differential have been previously evaluated as diagnostic tools for EOS in small, single-center reports. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the complete blood cell count and differential in EOS in a large, multicenter population of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: Using a cohort of 166,092 neonates with suspected EOS with cultures admitted to 293 neonatal intensive care units, we calculated odds ratios and receiver operating characteristic curves for complete blood cell count indices and prediction of a positive culture. We determined sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios for various commonly used cutoff values from the complete blood cell count. RESULTS: Low white blood cell counts, low absolute neutrophil counts and high immature-to-total neutrophil ratios were associated with increasing odds of infection (highest odds ratios: 5.38, 6.84 and 7.97, respectively). Specificity and negative predictive values were high (73.7%-99.9% and >99.8%). However, sensitivities were low (0.3%-54.5%) for all complete blood cell count indices analyzed. CONCLUSION: Low white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count and high immature-to-total neutrophil ratio were associated with increasing odds of infection, but no complete blood cell count-derived index possesses the sensitivity to rule out reliably EOS in neonates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/inf.0b013e318256905c

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Hornik, C. P., Benjamin, D. K., Becker, K. C., Benjamin, D. K., Li, J., Clark, R. H., Cohen-Wolkowiez, M., & Smith, P. B.
Venue
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Published
2012-08
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
799-802
ISSN
0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074045174
Cited by
282
References
0
FWCI
11.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of the Complete Blood Cell Count in Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/inf.0b013e318256905c
The paper
Hornik, C. P., Benjamin, D. K., Becker, K. C., Benjamin, D. K., Li, J., Clark, R. H., Cohen-Wolkowiez, M., & Smith, P. B. (2012). Use of the Complete Blood Cell Count in Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. https://doi.org/10.1097/inf.0b013e318256905c

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.