Cited by 129Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Longitudinal evaluation of patient-reported outcomes measurement information systems measures in pediatric chronic pain

Open access

Abstract

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative is a comprehensive strategy by the National Institutes of Health to support the development and validation of precise instruments to assess self-reported health domains across healthy and disease-specific populations. Much progress has been made in instrument development, but there remains a gap in the validation of PROMIS measures for pediatric chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the construct validity and responsiveness to change of 7 PROMIS domains for the assessment of children (ages: 8-18) with chronic pain--Pain Interference, Fatigue, Anxiety, Depression, Mobility, Upper Extremity Function, and Peer Relationships. The PROMIS measures were administered at the initial visit and 2 follow-up visits at an outpatient chronic pain clinic (CPC; N = 82) and at an intensive amplified musculoskeletal pain day-treatment program (N = 63). Aim 1 examined construct validity of PROMIS measures by comparing them with corresponding "legacy" measures administered as part of usual care in the CPC sample. Aim 2 examined sensitivity to change in both CPC and amplified musculoskeletal pain samples. Longitudinal growth models showed that PROMIS' Pain Interference, Anxiety, Depression, Mobility, Upper Extremity, and Peer Relationship measures and legacy instruments generally performed similarly with slightly steeper slopes of improvement in legacy measures. All 7 PROMIS domains showed responsiveness to change. Results offered initial support for the validity of PROMIS measures in pediatric chronic pain. Further validation with larger and more diverse pediatric pain samples and additional legacy measures would broaden the scope of use of PROMIS in clinical research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000378

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 129

Metadata

Authors
Kashikar-Zuck, S., Carle, A., Barnett, K., Goldschneider, K. R., Sherry, D. D., Mara, C. A., Cunningham, N., Farrell, J., Tress, J., & DeWitt, E. M.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Venue
Pain
Published
2016-02
Volume
157
Issue
2
Pages
339-347
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2253221496
Cited by
129
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ar057940-04)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (U01AR052171, U01AR057956, U01AR057967, U01AR052186, U01-AR-057940, 17 1U01AR057940, U01AR057936, U54AR057943, U01AR057929, U01AR052158, K24AR056687, U01AR052155, U01AR052181, U01AR057971, U01AR057954, U01AR057948, U54AR057926, U54AR057951)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
PROMIS, patient-reported outcomes, pediatric chronic pain, construct validity, responsiveness to change, pain interference, fatigue, anxiety, depression, mobility (physical function), upper limb function, peer relationships, musculoskeletal pain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Pain Measurement, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Pain Clinics, Electronic Health Records, Self Report, Chronic Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Longitudinal evaluation of patient-reported outcomes measurement information systems measures in pediatric chronic pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000378
The paper
Kashikar-Zuck, S., Carle, A., Barnett, K., Goldschneider, K. R., Sherry, D. D., Mara, C. A., Cunningham, N., Farrell, J., Tress, J., & DeWitt, E. M. (2016). Longitudinal evaluation of patient-reported outcomes measurement information systems measures in pediatric chronic pain. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000378