The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
iPeer2Peer program: a pilot feasibility study in adolescents with chronic pain
Abstract
Adolescents with chronic pain are often socially isolated, having never met others with chronic pain, and often feel misunderstood by healthy peers. Adolescence is a sensitive period for developing one's sense of self and autonomy, which often occurs in the context of peer relationships. This developmental process is disrupted in adolescents when their chronic pain interferes with their social interactions. Peer mentoring is proposed as a developmentally timely intervention. The aim of this study is to develop and test the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of the iPeer2Peer program. The iPeer2Peer program is a tailored peer mentorship program that provides modeling and reinforcement by peers (trained young adults with chronic pain aged 18-25 years who have learned to successfully manage their pain). This program aimed to enhance self-management of chronic pain in adolescents through 10 Skype video calls over the course of 8 weeks. A pilot randomized controlled trial design using waitlist controls was used in an adolescent chronic pain sample. Twenty-eight adolescents aged 14.8 ± 1.6 years (93% female) completed the trial (intervention: n = 12; control n = 16). Three adolescents completed the intervention after completing their participation in the control arm. The iPeer2Peer program was feasible and acceptable, provided the adolescents were given more time to complete all 10 calls. When compared with controls, adolescents who completed the iPeer2Peer program had significant improvement in self-management skills and their coping efforts were more successful. The iPeer2Peer program is a promising peer mentoring intervention that complements standard care for adolescents with chronic pain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Evidence-based pediatric pain interventions include individual and group cognitive behavioral (CBT) and acceptance and commitment therapies (ACT), peer support [6], and parent/family [7] treatment.”
From Multi-family pediatric pain group therapy: Capturing acceptance and cultivating change (2017) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“As youth and parent sessions are often held separately, adolescents and families may have little opportunity to meet or be mentored by others with personal experience effectively managing pain [6].”
From Multi-family pediatric pain group therapy: Capturing acceptance and cultivating change (2017) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 · Cited by 13,339
Psychometric Characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G. D., Powell, S. S., Farley, G. K., Werkman, S., & Berkoff, K. A. (1990) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095 · Cited by 4,855
Psychometric Characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G., Powell, S., Farley, G., Werkman, S., & Berkoff, K. (1990) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5503&4_17 · Cited by 4,854
The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: A systematic review
King, S., Chambers, C. T., Huguet, A., MacNevin, R. C., McGrath, P. J., Parker, L., & MacDonald, A. J. (2011) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.016 · Cited by 1,688
The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: Taking pain into account
Nicholas, M. K. (2007) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.008 · Cited by 1,656
Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis
Dennis, C. (2003) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00092-5 · Cited by 1,293
Canty-Mitchell, J., & Zimet, G. D. (2000) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1005109522457 · Cited by 844
Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: the place of the internet
Gray, N. J., Klein, J. D., Noyce, P. R., Sesselberg, T. S., & Cantrill, J. A. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.010 · Cited by 791
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2007) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/14768320600941756 · Cited by 579
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Ahola Kohut, 2014, Systematic review of peer support interventions for adolescents with chronic illness: a narrative analysis, Int J Child Adolesc Health, 7, 183
- Williams, 2010, Measurement of medical self-management and transition readiness among Canadian adolescents with special health care needs, Int J Child Adolesc Health, 3, 527
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fisher, E., Law, E. F., Palermo, T. M., & Eccleston, C. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011118.pub2 · Cited by 244
Fisher, E., Law, E., Dudeney, J., Eccleston, C., & Palermo, T. M. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011118.pub3 · Cited by 164
Jibb, L., Stevens, B., Nathan, P. C., Seto, E., Cafazzo, J. A., Johnston, D. L., Hum, V., & Stinson, J. (2017) · Pediatric Blood & Cancer · doi:10.1002/pbc.26554 · Cited by 149
Self-citationShaw, S. E., Wherton, J. P., Vijayaraghavan, S., Morris, J. H., Bhattacharya, S., Hanson, P., Campbell-Richards, D., Ramoutar, S., Collard, A., Hodkinson, I., et al. (2018) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr06210 · Cited by 147
Stinson, J., Kohut, S. A., Forgeron, P. A., Amaria, K., Bell, M. J., Kaufman, M. E., Luca, N. J. C., Luca, S., Harris, L., Victor, C. J., et al. (2016) · Pediatric Rheumatology · doi:10.1186/s12969-016-0108-2 · Cited by 123
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahola Kohut, S., Stinson, J. N., Ruskin, D., Forgeron, P., Harris, L., van Wyk, M., Luca, S., & Campbell, F.
- Affiliations
- Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1146-1155
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2276533368
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (126528)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
- Keywords
- adolescent chronic pain, peer mentoring, pain self-management, video calls, feasibility and acceptability, coping, social isolation, peer support
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Pain Measurement, Peer Group, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Internet, Young Adult, Chronic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review