Cited by 89Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

iPeer2Peer program: a pilot feasibility study in adolescents with chronic pain

Abstract

Adolescents with chronic pain are often socially isolated, having never met others with chronic pain, and often feel misunderstood by healthy peers. Adolescence is a sensitive period for developing one's sense of self and autonomy, which often occurs in the context of peer relationships. This developmental process is disrupted in adolescents when their chronic pain interferes with their social interactions. Peer mentoring is proposed as a developmentally timely intervention. The aim of this study is to develop and test the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of the iPeer2Peer program. The iPeer2Peer program is a tailored peer mentorship program that provides modeling and reinforcement by peers (trained young adults with chronic pain aged 18-25 years who have learned to successfully manage their pain). This program aimed to enhance self-management of chronic pain in adolescents through 10 Skype video calls over the course of 8 weeks. A pilot randomized controlled trial design using waitlist controls was used in an adolescent chronic pain sample. Twenty-eight adolescents aged 14.8 ± 1.6 years (93% female) completed the trial (intervention: n = 12; control n = 16). Three adolescents completed the intervention after completing their participation in the control arm. The iPeer2Peer program was feasible and acceptable, provided the adolescents were given more time to complete all 10 calls. When compared with controls, adolescents who completed the iPeer2Peer program had significant improvement in self-management skills and their coping efforts were more successful. The iPeer2Peer program is a promising peer mentoring intervention that complements standard care for adolescents with chronic pain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000496

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ahola Kohut, 2014, Systematic review of peer support interventions for adolescents with chronic illness: a narrative analysis, Int J Child Adolesc Health, 7, 183
  2. Williams, 2010, Measurement of medical self-management and transition readiness among Canadian adolescents with special health care needs, Int J Child Adolesc Health, 3, 527

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ahola Kohut, S., Stinson, J. N., Ruskin, D., Forgeron, P., Harris, L., van Wyk, M., Luca, S., & Campbell, F.
Affiliations
Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Venue
Pain
Published
2016-05
Volume
157
Issue
5
Pages
1146-1155
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2276533368
Cited by
89
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4
FWCI
12.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (126528)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
adolescent chronic pain, peer mentoring, pain self-management, video calls, feasibility and acceptability, coping, social isolation, peer support
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Pain Measurement, Peer Group, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Internet, Young Adult, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review