Cited by 20Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

Cancer–Peer Connection in the Context of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer: A Qualitative Exploration

Hotchkiss, Maiya E., Ahmad, Zeba N., Ford, Jennifer S.·2023·Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: This qualitative study examined experiences and attitudes related to cancer–peer interactions among adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. Methods: Twenty-six survivors, aged 16–24 years who were diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 14 and 18, completed one-on-one semistructured interviews as part of a larger study. Interviews were coded and analyzed using an iterative consensus and data-driven approach. Results: The data for this study revealed three main themes related to cancer peers, including the unique aspects of shared illness experience (i.e., personalizing of support from lived experience, inspiration from upward comparisons, space to be scared and to joke about cancer), benefits of providing support to other patients/survivors (i.e., giving back, healing after cancer, and incorporating cancer into life as a survivor), and considerations and concerns when connecting with cancer peers (i.e., exposure to adverse outcomes, “ignorance is bliss”: blocking cancer out, guilt and cancer imposter syndrome). Conclusion: Study findings demonstrate the importance of cancer–peer connection and support in AYA cancer care, both during treatment and in survivorship. Future research should explore the ways in which peer-to-peer support programs could be tailored to best serve the AYA population in the context of cancer care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jayao.2021.0170

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • YA have limited opportunities to connect with other YA with cancer following diagnosis and often feel as though their peers, family, and members of their community do not understand what it is like to be a young person who has had cancer.

    “Our work [33] and the work of others [53, 54, 85] suggest that YA have limited opportunities to connect with other YA with cancer following diagnosis and often feel as though their peers, family, and members of their community do not understand what it is like to be a young person who has had cancer.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hotchkiss, M. E., Ahmad, Z. N., & Ford, J. S.
Affiliations
  • City University of New York (US)
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
Corresponding author
Ford, Jennifer S.
Venue
Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology
Published
2023-02-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
83-92
ISSN
  • 2156-5333 (ISSN-L)
  • 2156-535X
OpenAlex
W4225899920
Cited by
20
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
adolescent and young adult cancer, cancer survivors, peer connection, peer support, survivorship, guilt, social support, lived experience
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Survivorship, Adolescent, Humans, Neoplasms, Peer Group, Survivors, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review