CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 461Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentAnesthesia and Pain ManagementPain Management and Opioid Use

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends and predictors of opioid use after total knee and total hip arthroplasty

Open access
Goesling, Jenna, Moser, Stephanie E., Zaidi, Bilal, Hassett, Afton L., Hilliard, Paul, Hallstrom, Brian, Clauw, Daniel J., Brummett, Chad M.·2016·Pain
DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000516PMC PMC4868627
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Few studies have assessed postoperative trends in opioid cessation and predictors of persistent opioid use after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Preoperatively, 574 TKA and THA patients completed validated, self-report measures of pain, functioning, and mood and were longitudinally assessed for 6 months after surgery. Among patients who were opioid naive the day of surgery, 8.2% of TKA and 4.3% of THA patients were using opioids at 6 months. In comparison, 53.3% of TKA and 34.7% of THA patients who reported opioid use the day of surgery continued to use opioids at 6 months. Patients taking >60 mg oral morphine equivalents preoperatively had an 80% likelihood of persistent use postoperatively. Day of surgery predictors for 6-month opioid use by opioid-naive patients included greater overall body pain (P = 0.002), greater affected joint pain (knee/hip) (P = 0.034), and greater catastrophizing (P = 0.010). For both opioid-naive and opioid users on the day of surgery, decreases in overall body pain from baseline to 6 months were associated with decreased odds of being on opioids at 6 months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.72, P = 0.050; aOR = 0.62, P = 0.001); however, change in affected joint pain (knee/hip) was not predictive of opioid use (aOR = 0.99, P = 0.939; aOR = 1.00, P = 0.963). In conclusion, many patients taking opioids before surgery continue to use opioids after arthroplasty and some opioid-naive patients remained on opioids; however, persistent opioid use was not associated with change in joint pain. Given the growing concerns about chronic opioid use, the reasons for persistent opioid use and perioperative prescribing of opioids deserve further study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000516

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bellamy, 2005, WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index User Guide. Version V. Book WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index User Guide. Version V, Clin Exp Rheumatol, 23, 148

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Goesling, J., Moser, S. E., Zaidi, B., Hassett, A. L., Hilliard, P., Hallstrom, B., Clauw, D. J., & Brummett, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
ORCID
Venue
Pain
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2016-06
Volume
157
Issue
6
Pages
1259-1265
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000516
PMC
PMC4868627
OpenAlex
W2405020007
Cited by
461
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 4
FWCI
48.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR060392)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
opioid use, total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, persistent opioid use, opioid cessation, opioid-naive patients, preoperative opioid use, morphine milligram equivalents, pain catastrophizing, joint pain, bodily pain, predictors of opioid use, chronic opioid use
MeSH terms
Aged, Analgesics, Opioid, Female, Hip Joint, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Middle Aged, Morphine, Postoperative Pain, Pain, Postoperative, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review