Cited by 63Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnesthesia and Pain ManagementTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

To be mindful of the breath or pain: Comparing two brief preoperative mindfulness techniques for total joint arthroplasty patients

Open access
Hanley, Adam W., Gililland, Jeremy, Garland, Eric L.·2021·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) often reduces pain and improves function, but it is also a risk factor for the development of chronic pain and postoperative opioid use. To protect against these untoward postsurgical outcomes, TJA patients need better, non-pharmacological pain management strategies. This study compared two, promising, mindfulness-based pain management techniques. METHOD: We conducted a single-site, three-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled study conducted at an orthopedic clinic among patients undergoing TJA of the knee or hip. TJA patients (N = 118, M age = 65, female = 73, Caucasian = 110) were randomized to either a preoperative mindfulness of breath (MoB), mindfulness of pain (MoP), or cognitive-behavioral pain psychoeducation (CB) intervention, approximately 3 weeks before surgery. Each intervention was delivered in a single, 20-min session during a 2-hr, preoperative education program. Change in pain intensity was the sole preoperative outcome. The postoperative outcomes, pain intensity, pain interference, and opioid use were assessed on the 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th postoperative days. RESULTS: MoB was found to most effectively decrease preoperative pain scores, F(2, 89) = 5.28, p = .007, while MoP resulted in the least amount of postoperative pain intensity, F(8, 94) = 3.21, p = .003, and interference, F(8, 94) = 2.52, p = .016). Both MoB and MoP decreased postoperative opioid use relative to CB, F(8, 83) = 16.66, p < .001. CONCLUSION: A brief preoperative MBI may be able to prevent both postoperative pain and opioid use. Moreover, the MBIs used in this study are highly feasible, capable of being delivered by nearly any healthcare provider, and requiring minimal clinic time given their brevity. As such, embedding MBIs in surgical care pathways has considerable potential. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000657

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpersonal mindfulness-based interventions conducted in group formats have shown positive outcomes, such as increased social connectedness and reductions in psychopathological symptoms.

    “Interpersonal MBIs conducted in group formats have also shown positive outcomes, such as increased social connectedness and reductions in psychopathological symptoms [37,38,39].”

    From 10-Week Trajectories of Candidate Psychological Processes Differentially Predict Mental Health Gains from Online Dyadic versus Mindfulness Interventions: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2024) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Methods > Interventions passage describes brief, single-session mindfulness techniques for managing surgical pain, and the Results > Path Model passage reports pain outcomes. Searches for interpersonal mindfulness, group-format delivery, social connectedness, and psychopathological symptoms found no passage addressing the attributed claim. The available passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Garland EL (2013). Mindfulness-oriented recovery enhancement for addiction, stress, and pain. NASW Press, National Association of Social Workers.
  2. Holm S (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 65– 70.
  3. Irvin R (2007). Information and communication technology (ICT) literacy: Integration and assessment in higher education. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 5(4), 50– 55.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanley, A. W., Gililland, J., & Garland, E. L.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2021-07
Volume
89
Issue
7
Pages
590-600
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W3175471757
Cited by
63
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Universty of Utah College of Social Work
  • National Institutes of Health (R01DA042033)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, total joint arthroplasty, preoperative analgesia, postoperative pain, opioid use, pain interference, knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, non-pharmacological pain management
MeSH terms
Aged, Analgesics, Opioid, Arthroplasty, Female, Humans, Male, Postoperative Pain, Preoperative Care, Psychotherapy, Brief, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review