Cited by 39Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Translating e-pain research into patient care

Open access

Abstract

Recently, a call was made to expand the availability of pain self-management for the public, but several obstacles limit access to pain services such as distance, cost, and availability. Technology-based interventions can help with access to pain management, and consideration of these opportunities is timely given service pressures, changing consumer preferences, and the burgeoning ownership of personal computers and smartphones. In that context, we have described the features of e-pain technologies, the challenges in developing e-pain technologies, the existing evidence in relation to technology-based pain management, the debate regarding regulation of e-pain treatments, and the likely steps for future development of these interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000686

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nicholas, 2015, Expanding patients' access to help in managing their chronic pain, Pain: Clin Update, xxii, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 39

Metadata

Authors
McGuire, B. E., Henderson, E. M., & McGrath, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
McGuire, Brian E.
Venue
Pain
Published
2016-08-10
Volume
158
Issue
2
Pages
190-193
ISSN
  • 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1872-6623
OpenAlex
W2511136173
Cited by
39
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
pain self-management, digital health interventions
MeSH terms
Patient Care, Humans, Pain, Pain Measurement, Psychotherapy, Translating, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review