Cited by 364Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsPain Management and Opioid Use

Smartphone applications for pain management

Rosser, Benjamin A, Eccleston, Christopher·2011·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

Smartphone applications (or apps) are becoming increasingly popular. The lack of regulation or guidance for health-related apps means that the validity and reliability of their content is unknown. We have conducted a review of available apps relating to the generic condition of pain. The official application stores for five major smartphone platforms were searched: iPhone, Android, Blackberry, Nokia/Symbian and Windows Mobile. Apps were included if they reported a focus on pain education, management or relief, and were not solely aimed at health-care professionals (HCPs). A total of 111 apps met the inclusion criteria. The majority of apps reviewed claimed some information provision or electronic manual component. Diary tracking of pain variables was also a common feature. There was a low level of stated HCP involvement in app development and content. Despite an increasing number of apps being released, the frequency of HCP involvement is not increasing. Pain apps appear to be able to promise pain relief without any concern for the effectiveness of the product, or for possible adverse effects of product use. In a population often desperate for a solution to distressing and debilitating pain conditions, there is considerable risk of individuals being misled.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/jtt.2011.101102

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosser, B. A., & Eccleston, C.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Eccleston, Christopher
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2011-08-15
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
308-312
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2127728884
Cited by
364
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
FWCI
55.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/F002815/1, EP/F001916/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
mobile application, pain management, pain education, health apps, app regulation, electronic manuals, misleading health claims, consumer health information
MeSH terms
Humans, Medical Records, Cell Phone, Chronic Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review