Cited by 30Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationChronic Disease Management Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health utilities in people with chronic pain using a population-level survey and linked health care administrative data

Abstract

Health utilities are a preference-based measure of health-related quality of life that facilitates comparison of disease burden across conditions. We estimated utilities using a population-based, matched sample of adolescents and adults with and without chronic pain, controlling for comorbidity. Ontarians aged ≥12 years with and without chronic pain were identified from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) 2000-2001 and 2009-2010 and linked to their provincial health care administrative data. Individuals with chronic pain were matched to those without using age, sex, survey year, and a propensity score for having chronic pain estimated from a rurality index, income quintile, and comorbidity. The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 instrument, included in the Canadian Community Health Survey, was used. Mean utilities were calculated for each group. Utility decrement for chronic pain was also calculated for each matched pair. A total of 65,246 responses were available for analysis. After matching, there were 12,146 matched pairs with and without pain. In the matched cohort, mean age was 54 years (SD 12); 61% were female. The matched cohort with chronic pain had a mean utility of 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.58-0.59), and the decrement associated with chronic pain was 0.32 (95% confidence interval 0.31-0.32). Utilities in people with chronic pain were lower than, and decrements larger than, those seen with most other chronic diseases including heart disease, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These data will be useful to inform priorities and future strategies for the prevention and control of chronic pain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000776

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Hogan, M.-E., Taddio, A., Katz, J., Shah, V., & Krahn, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • York University (CA)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Hogan, Mary-Ellen
Venue
Pain
Published
2016-11-24
Volume
158
Issue
3
Pages
408-416
ISSN
  • 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1872-6623
OpenAlex
W2557364676
Cited by
30
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
health utility, chronic pain, health-related quality of life, Health Utilities Index Mark 3, disease burden, comorbidities, adolescents, adults, Ontario, Canadian Community Health Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Canada, Child, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Health Services, Health Services Administration, Health Status Indicators, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual, Mood Disorders, Young Adult, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review