Cited by 85Digital Mental Health InterventionsRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A tailored-guided internet-based cognitive-behavioral intervention for patients with rheumatoid arthritis as an adjunct to standard rheumatological care: results of a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Ferwerda, Maaike, van Beugen, Sylvia, van Middendorp, Henriët, Spillekom-van Koulil, Saskia, Donders, A. Rogier T., Visser, Henk, Taal, Erik, Creemers, Marjonne C.W., van Riel, Piet C.L.M., Evers, Andrea W.M.·2017·Pain

Abstract

For patients with chronic pain conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who experience elevated levels of distress, tailored-guided internet-based cognitive-behavioral treatment may be effective in improving psychological and physical functioning, and reducing the impact of RA on daily life. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial was conducted for RA patients with elevated levels of distress as assessed by a disease-specific measure. The control group (n = 71) received standard care and the intervention group (n = 62) additionally received an internet-based tailored cognitive-behavioral intervention. Main analyses were performed using a linear mixed model estimating differences between the intervention and control groups in scores of psychological functioning, physical functioning, and impact of RA on daily life at preassesment and postassessment, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Patients who received the internet-based intervention reported a larger improvement in psychological functioning compared with the control group, indicating less depressed mood (P< 0.001,d= 0.54), negative mood (P= 0.01,d= 0.38), and anxiety (P< 0.001,d= 0.48) during the course of the 1-year follow-up period. Regarding physical functioning, a trend was found for the intervention group reporting less fatigue than the control group (P= 0.06,d= 0.24), whereas no effect was found on pain. No effects were found for the impact of RA on daily life, except for the intervention group experiencing fewer role limitations due to emotional problems (P< 0.001,d= 0.53). Offering guided internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy is a promising development to aid patients with psychological distress particularly in improving psychological functioning. Further research on adherence and specific intervention ingredients is warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000845

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

3 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 85

Metadata

Authors
Ferwerda, M., van Beugen, S., van Middendorp, H., Spillekom-van Koulil, S., Donders, A. R. T., Visser, H., Taal, E., Creemers, M. C. W., van Riel, P. C. L. M., & Evers, A. W. M.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
  • Medical Psychology and
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Rijnstate Hospital (NL)
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Ferwerda, Maaike
Venue
Pain
Published
2017-01-12
Volume
158
Issue
5
Pages
868-878
ISSN
  • 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1872-6623
OpenAlex
W2578268303
Cited by
85
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Pfizer (WS682746)
  • ZonMw
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, psychological distress, depression, anxiety, fatigue, physical function, chronic pain
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Pain Measurement, Physical Examination, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Disease Management, Mood Disorders, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review