Cited by 14Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Support for a non-therapist assisted, internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (iCBT) intervention for mental health in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Open access
Blaney, Caitlin, Hitchon, Carol A., Marrie, Ruth Ann, Mackenzie, Corey, Holens, Pamela, El-Gabalawy, Renée·2021·Internet Interventions

Abstract

Anxiety is common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and associated with worse RA outcomes. This study assessed the feasibility and preliminary health impacts (mental and physical) of a non-therapist assisted, online mental health intervention targeting anxiety in this population. Participants with confirmed RA and elevated anxiety symptoms were enrolled into the Worry and Sadness program, an Internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (iCBT) intervention for anxiety and depression shown to be effective in the general population. Validated self-report measures of anxiety, depression, pain interference, fatigue, physical health-related quality of life, functional status, and patient-reported disease severity were collected at baseline, post-intervention, and at three-month follow-up. Emotional distress scores were tracked between lessons. Participants provided qualitative feedback in writing post-intervention. We analyzed the responses of 34 participants; the majority was female (86%) and the mean age was 57 (SD = 13). Of these, 80% (n = 28) completed the study in its entirety. Among these completers, 94.1% described the program as worthwhile. We found statistically significant improvements in anxiety, depression and fatigue from baseline to three-month follow-up, with small to large effect sizes (d = 0.39–0.81). Post-hoc analyses revealed that statistically significant change occurred between baseline and post-intervention for anxiety and depression and was maintained at three-month follow-up, whereas statistically significant change occurred between baseline and three-month follow-up for fatigue. Statistically significant reductions in emotional distress occurred across the program, with a large effect size (d = 1.16) between the first and last lesson. The Worry and Sadness program shows promise as a feasible resource for improving mental health in RA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100385

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pain researchers also describe alternative development strategies, such as digitalizing a paper-based self-help book or treatment manual, adapting or testing a digital treatment originally targeting another condition, relying on clinical expertise and knowledge of the research team, and/or following theoretical frameworks.

    “Pain researchers also describe alternative development strategies, such as digitalizing a paper-based self-help book or treatment manual (Bendelin et al., 2018; Ljótsson et al., 2014), adapting or testing a digital treatment originally targeting another condition such as depression or anxiety (Blaney et al., 2021; Dear et al., 2018), relying on clinical expertise and knowledge of the research team”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blaney, C., Hitchon, C. A., Marrie, R. A., Mackenzie, C., Holens, P., & El-Gabalawy, R.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
El-Gabalawy, Renée
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
24
Pages
100385
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3149545080
Cited by
14
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Arthritis Society
  • University of Manitoba
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety, depression, fatigue, mental health, emotional distress, feasibility, pain interference, health-related quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review