The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classism in pain assessment and management: the mediating role of female patient dehumanization and perceived life hardship
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT: Compared with racism and sexism, classism in pain assessment and management practices (PAMPs) has been less investigated, and its mediating mechanisms are still unknown. Drawing on a social psychological model of dehumanization, this research aimed to test (1) the effect of patient socioeconomic status (SES; a proxy of social class) on PAMPs and (2) whether patient dehumanization and perceived life hardship mediated these effects. Two online experimental studies were conducted, in which patient SES was manipulated (low vs high) within-subjects. One-hundred sixty-two female medical students (study 1) and 105 female nurses (study 2) were presented with vignettes/images depicting 2 cases of women with chronic low-back pain, followed by videos of them performing a pain-inducing movement. Participants reported on patient dehumanization, perceived life hardship, and PAMPs. The low SES patient was perceived as less pain sensitive (medical students alone) but more disabled, credible, and her pain more attributed to psychological causes (by nurses alone). Medical students recommended less nonpharmacological treatments but prescribed slightly stronger medication. Medical students were less willing to provide individualized care to the low SES patient, whereas nurses showed the opposite pattern. Patient mechanistic dehumanization mediated SES effects on pain disability (medical students alone). Perceived life hardship mediated SES effects on pain disability, credibility (nurses alone), and intentions of providing individualized care (nurses alone). These finding bear novel contributions to the fields of pain, health service research, and social psychology and have important implications to the development of more effective future interventions to reduce classism in PAMPs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is worth noting that just under two-thirds (n=31)9 18 19 25 28 47 50–74 of research papers on HP SES implicit bias and decision-making focused on doctors/physicians, with significantly less studies focusing on interprofessional or multidisciplinary teams (n=6),75–80 nurses (n=4)29 81–83 and medical students (n=4).27 84–86”
From Health professionals implicit bias of patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [79]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment
Breivik, H., Collett, B., Ventafridda, V., Cohen, R., & Gallacher, D. (2006) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009 · Cited by 5,486
Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586 · Cited by 5,080
Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Katz, N. P., Kerns, R. D., Stucki, G., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., et al. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012 · Cited by 3,732
Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1): Figure 1
Galobardes, B., Shaw, M., Lawlor, D. A., Lynch, J. W., & Smith, G. D. (2005) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2004.023531 · Cited by 2,979
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919
Dehumanization and Infrahumanization
Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045 · Cited by 1,286
Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework.
Montoya, A. K., & Hayes, A. F. (2016) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000086 · Cited by 1,004
Marmot, M. G. (2004) · Significance · doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2004.00058.x · Cited by 992
Prevalence of chronic low back pain: systematic review
Meucci, R. D., Fassa, A. G., & Faria, N. M. X. (2015) · Revista de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/s0034-8910.2015049005874 · Cited by 977
Samulowitz, A., Gremyr, I., Eriksson, E. M., & Hensing, G. K. E. (2018) · Pain Research and Management · doi:10.1155/2018/6358624 · Cited by 862
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Antunes, 2011, International cross-cultural comparative study on perceptions of nurses in relation to the individualized nursing care, Rev Invest Enferm, 24, 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kapos, F. P., Craig, K. D., Anderson, S. R., Bernardes, S. F., Hirsh, A. T., Karos, K., Keogh, E., Losin, E. A. R., McParland, J. L., Moore, D., et al. (2024) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104608 · Cited by 108
Self-citationSocioeconomic position and pain: a topical review
Khalatbari‐Soltani, S., & Blyth, F. (2022) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002634 · Cited by 56
Job, C., Adenipekun, B., Cleves, A., Gill, P., & Samuriwo, R. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081723 · Cited by 44
Sex-Related Differences in Chronic Pain: A Narrative Review by a Multidisciplinary Task Force
Marchesini, M., Fornasari, D., Natoli, S., Vegni, E. A. M., & Cuomo, A. (2025) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina61071172 · Cited by 24
Alboom, M. V., Baert, F., Bernardes, S. F., Bracke, P., & Goubert, L. (2023) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2023.05.007 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernardes, S. F., Tomé-Pires, C., Brandão, T., Campos, L., Teixeira, F., & Goubert, L.
- Affiliations
- Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social (PT)
- CIP—Centro de Investigação em Psicologia, Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Autonomous University of Lisbon (PT)
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Bernardes, Sónia F.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2021-03-22
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2854-2864
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- 1872-6623
- OpenAlex
- W3136178951
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Repositório do ISCTE-IUL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/MHC-PSC/2041/2014)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
- Keywords
- classism, pain assessment and management, socioeconomic status, chronic low back pain, pain-related disability, individualized care, medical students, nurses, non-pharmacological treatment, pain medication prescribing
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Pain Measurement, Social Class, Students, Medical, Low Back Pain, Dehumanization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
